40oz
diRTbAg
Posts: 6,105
|
Post by 40oz on Apr 13, 2022 4:09:47 GMT -5
Is it misogyny to remove my respect for a mans pronouns so i can denigrate them for being a woman?
For clarity i dont think about any women this way. i just thought it would add emphasis to the 'inaction' point in my post to speak in a manner that i dont think bob has ever defended a woman (or especially any transgender man for that matter) for being treated this way.
|
|
|
Post by mayhemicdestrvctor on Apr 13, 2022 4:21:17 GMT -5
what ??? and i said i think the first woman of arch enemy was better. but theres also a band , they re famous, they re called holy moses , and they have a woman and her singing is extremely good. thats what i said. so i think it also proves that they can be as good as any other man even if most people think they cant sing in a way that will fit into this rock music
|
|
xeepeep
Banned
Forever
Posts: 2,338
|
Post by xeepeep on Apr 13, 2022 6:18:47 GMT -5
Jesus dude, not everyone is talking to you. Read the room a little.
|
|
|
Post by mayhemicdestrvctor on Apr 13, 2022 6:32:33 GMT -5
ok sorry , i thought , he was responding to me
|
|
skyr
Doomer
pocket full of rocket fuel and pyramid stones
Posts: 264
|
Post by skyr on Apr 13, 2022 9:44:30 GMT -5
1 million people claiming to be transgender out of a population of 338 million is a massive amount. I wouldn't call 0.3% a 'massive' amount. Quite the opposite actually. 99.7% is a massive amount, which is the amount of people that feels comfortable with the gender they are born with. And survey's are kinda a shit method to draw conlusions from, it just singles out people who have acces to a survey and people who are willing to answer a survey (mixed with some other problems), and often times people will not answer a survey when it is not related to them, which will give you a skewed result. And extrapolating results might give you an idea about numbers, but it is not guaranteed that the trend continious. And if you dont want to respond to every other point I made (Possibly because you dont have any counter argument to it), then why the fuck would I respond to the rest of your text, which mostly consist out of random assumptions grabbed out of thin air. It doesn't seem that you want to know what is right, you just want to be right. 'Ipsa scientia potestas est' except there is no power to gain if the knowledge is based upon nothing
|
|
xeepeep
Banned
Forever
Posts: 2,338
|
Post by xeepeep on Apr 13, 2022 10:07:58 GMT -5
0,3% is absolutely a massive amount when talking about a single mental disorder. It's like with Covid having a 1% mortality rate -- still over 5 million people died.
|
|
skyr
Doomer
pocket full of rocket fuel and pyramid stones
Posts: 264
|
Post by skyr on Apr 13, 2022 10:36:41 GMT -5
Well, that is the problem when using terminology like this. There is no objective truth in what is massive, you need to relate it to something. The earth is massive compared to a single human, but incredibly tiny if you compare it to the scale of the universe. That's why I'd rather work with numbers than with words and no, I don't think 0.3% is massive in any circumstance. 1 is not massive compared to 300. We can also relate it to the amount of adult people who have mental ilnesses, which would be 1 in 5 in US (source: www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/mental-illness#:~:text=Mental%20illnesses%20are%20common%20in,mild%20to%20moderate%20to%20severe.) which I would consider a massive amount. This then means 1 in 60 people dealing with mental illnesses deal with gender dysphoria, which eh not sure if I would even call this massive. But is it already more considerable than 1 in 300. And if 1 in 5 people have a mental disorder, this means 1 in 5 times nature fucks up with our pre-concieved notion of what is healthy, then 1 in 300 is still not massive. That is if you consider gender dysphoria a mental illness, which I am not sure about. Because it seems more likely nature is just fucking up, because our pre-concieved notion is usually fucking wrong
|
|
xeepeep
Banned
Forever
Posts: 2,338
|
Post by xeepeep on Apr 13, 2022 10:44:52 GMT -5
The law of big numbers my dude. 0,3% of the world's population is 30 million people, the population of Romania. In the case of the US it's over a million. the amount of adult people who have mental ilnesses, which would be 1 in 5 in US Jesus, the absolute state of America. That is if you consider gender dysphoria a mental illness, which I am not sure about You cannot be serious
|
|
skyr
Doomer
pocket full of rocket fuel and pyramid stones
Posts: 264
|
Post by skyr on Apr 13, 2022 11:00:29 GMT -5
that quote with your profil pic makes you seem like a B-brand joker. But yeah I am serious , partially because what I said directly afterwards and because humanity still don't even know how the brain fully work, so whatever the 'science' of psychiatry says I will take with a grain of salt. Psychiatry is to neuroscience what alchemy is to chemistry, an inferior field because we don't even know what the fuck we are working with. And even if you want to define it was a mental disorder, I honestly don't care, my points still stand.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2022 11:01:22 GMT -5
oh princess... look. youre probably gonna remain composed soon into this post because to do other wise would make you look like a total sissy and youre gonna want people to think youre macho right now so the men can take your little cosplay act seriously. Or not, you can scream and cry into your pillow all about it -- its none of my business. Let me use an analogy you would be familiar with. When theres a fire in the kitchen, right in front of you, your inaction is an action. Its not normal for you just stand there and say I dont need to do anything because you didnt start it. You certainly did because face it, women are always screwing things up... The problem needs to be dealt with. Furthermore, this topic of respecting peoples pronouns that youre breaking a nail over is really silly. My bros here already know that having your pronouns 'respected' is mutually understood by everyone at all times without it needing to be earned. You dont always notice it until people take it away from you, right hun? See, the men here are talking and your incessant nagging is a lot. you don't need to keep bitching about it. In fact, try this, sweetie. Heres how i can tell youre just being all hormonal and emotional and feelingshurt. Look up someone who identifies as a woman on doomworld, and search their entire post history for the words "respect my pronouns." you can come back to this convo when youve found a single post saying that. your just hearing things you want to hear instead of receiving it with logic and reasoning. Now next time you need to yap yap yap maybe you could gossip to your other sisters about it. you sound like you could use a girls night anyway. By the way, people would listen to you more if you just smile. its not a good look on you. Youre not fooling anyone Bob, with that macho name. its not at all attractive. its just sneaky and weird. why don't you want to come off pretty to the boys? i can tell you're a girl even when you think you need to prance around with a picture of a man in your profile. its not gonna somehow convince me to listen to you ya know. I see you're trying a new approach with this post. Interesting for sure. Cutting through your ham-fisted attempt to use demeaning and condescending language supposedly commonly employed by men when conversing with women(which I suppose somehow correlates to the topic of transgenderism?), your point is "inaction is an action". So using your analogy, what's the fire in the kitchen in the transgender debate, and what action am I failing to take?
|
|
40oz
diRTbAg
Posts: 6,105
|
Post by 40oz on Apr 13, 2022 11:59:19 GMT -5
@vordakk Sure, honey. Thanks for asking. Without needing to demand it, it's pretty much always mutually understood that our pronouns need to be respected. It's not debated. Men want to be called men, and women want to be called women, and some want no affiliation at all. "Advocates for transgenderism" (i.e. anyone who cares how their speech is perceived by others) are already trying to invalidate gender-specific name-calling and bullying as offensive (e.g. calling boys who are bad at sports that they "run," "catch," "throw like a girl") through teaching that genders are on a spectrum and that they are fluid and they are not tied to biology. If you have lived the life of someone who has absolute disinterest in hobbies and activities and behaviors that have since been associated with culturally normalized gender roles associated with the sexually indentifiable organs they were born with, that often means you've had to suffer the experience of being bullied on the playground, in the classroom, at summer camp, by your classmates, by your teachers, by your church, by your counselors, by your aunts and uncles, and/or by your parents. You've been constantly questioned, provoked to change, prodded to explain yourself, your clothing style, the colors you like, the idols you have, the activities you enjoy, by pretty much everyone you meet. Or alternatively, you've had to live a lie, suppressing your actual interests at the risk of those things all happening to you by people you've come to love and respect. It's the expected sequence of events for that person to want support to change their outward appearance to reflect who they actually are so they don't need to hide or explain it all the time. It will be addressed, finally, by their outward appearance. (If that's at all applicable during online discourse over text. I noticed you have a badge of honor indicating your gender on your profile. You're welcome for that.) It's the unfortunate reality that people have established their insistence to decide what your gender is for you by what you look like. When they have to deal with this on the constant, for many years of their lives, being indirectly called he/him/his becomes a trauma trigger. it interrupts their daily life. It happens with family, it happens at work, it happens when you go to the grocery store, it happens when you get pulled over by police. It happens pretty much everywhere. It reignites past feelings of being humiliated and invalidated. That's why the conversation of pronouns happens so often. We need people to know before you enter the conversation so it's not the first thing that's said when they're around you. And it has become their formal responsibility to own this issue, dial back their emotions, and calmly, respectfully, ask you politely, to either begin using they/them when referring to people who have not identified their gender to you, or dignify them with the respect of calling them only by the gender that they are. All of this with the assumed risk that you're not gonna fucking do it anyway. Your inaction is that when people tell you this you don't fucking care. You treat it like people are playing a game, and that their lived experiences cannot possibly be real, and this coming from your own perspective as someone who has probably never had their gender legitimately confused at any point in their life. I know this because I have met and talked to transgender people who have talked about being miserable during holiday seasons because they have a family member that obsesses over talking about what they heard on their preferred comfort place of alt-right news media. No matter how much she tries to explain herself, the family member absolutely denies her reality right in front of her face, and no one else in her family respects her decision to transition enough to stand up for her when this happens. So she's in agony every year as the season of holiday dinners turn around. She loves mom and dad, but this one family member gets invited every time and she has to excuse herself when that member arrives, and it's embarassing. I'm very familiar with this because I have a parent and extended family that are the same way. When you spend most of your time listening to one-sided communication, (e.g. conservative youtube preparing you with pre-meditated arguments and rebuttals to spit out when THE LIBERALS FINALLY ATTACK) It tells me you have absolutely no experience knowing what it's like to be a transgender person. There's not a fucking minute of a trans persons life that they'd be willing to waste talking to someone who says the things that you do expecting total impunity. There is absolutely no way. You can't possibly know what you're talking about. It's completely at odds with what I've come to learn from people whom I've expressed a genuine curiosity in their life. There's no power in it. It's misery. When people say they're doing it for attention, it severely overvalues social media presence. They usually have to create multiple social media accounts because they're identity has no agency in the lives of people who still see other people's genders as their own to decide. And when those people get together and say the things they do, it makes people who absolutely would beat the fuck out of a woman if they ever had sex and later found out they used to be a man. It sucks because people who say the things you do give these people legitimacy behind their actions. It's extremely important for you to adapt. You can say it's really not that important, but it absolutely is. Gender does mean something to you. it means something to everyone. This is scientifically and verfiably testable. People genderize things all the time. Germans in WWII named their giant howitzer cannon "Big Bertha." People call their primary vehicle a "she." You can quantify the responses when people react when M&Ms announces they are going to de-genderize their sexy green M&M. Or when the genders of the cast from the Ghostbusters movie get reassigned from men to women in the reboot. There's absolutely no congruency in the public reaction to this. Some people love it, some people hate it, and some people don't care. But when trans people are bullied, harrassed and beaten on the norm, they need you either shut the fuck up about what you think men and women are supposed to be, or to show some support to help put an end to a constant perpetuating cycle of abuse. And when you make these posts, you're not doing either of those things.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2022 13:17:52 GMT -5
Sure, honey. Thanks for asking. Without needing to demand it, it's pretty much always mutually understood that our pronouns need to be respected. It's not debated. Men want to be called men, and women want to be called women, and some want no affiliation at all. "Advocates for transgenderism" (i.e. anyone who cares how their speech is perceived by others) are already trying to invalidate gender-specific name-calling and bullying as offensive (e.g. calling boys who are bad at sports that they "run," "catch," "throw like a girl") through teaching that genders are on a spectrum and that they are fluid and they are not tied to biology. If you have lived the life of someone who has absolute disinterest in hobbies and activities and behaviors that have since been associated with culturally normalized gender roles associated with the sexually indentifiable organs they were born with, that often means you've had to suffer the experience of being bullied on the playground, in the classroom, at summer camp, by your classmates, by your teachers, by your church, by your counselors, by your aunts and uncles, and/or by your parents. You've been constantly questioned, provoked to change, prodded to explain yourself, your clothing style, the colors you like, the activities you enjoy, by pretty much everyone you meet. Or alternatively, you've had to live a lie, suppressing your actual interests at the risk of those things all happening to you by people you've come to love and respect. It's the expected sequence of events for that person to want support to change their outward appearance to reflect who they actually are so they don't need to hide or explain it all the time. It will be addressed, finally, by their outward appearance. (If that's at all applicable during online discourse over text.) It's the unfortunate reality that people have established their insistence to decide what your gender is for you by what you look like. When they have to deal with this on the constant, for many years of their lives, being indirectly called he/him/his becomes a trauma trigger. It reignites past feelings of being humiliated and invalidated. And it has become their formal responsibility to own this issue, dial back their emotions, and calmly, respectfully, ask you politely, to either begin using they/them when referring to people who have not identified their gender to you, or dignify them with the respect of calling them only by the gender that they are. All of this with the assumed risk that you're not gonna fucking do it anyway. Your inaction is that when people tell you this you don't fucking care. You treat it like people are playing a game, and that their lived experiences cannot possibly be real, and this coming from your own perspective as someone who has probably never had their gender legitimately confused at any point in their life, and that I know this because I have met and talked to transgender people who have talked about being miserable during holiday seasons because they have a family member that obsesses over talking about what they heard on their preferred comfort place of alt-right news media. No matter how much they try to explain themselves, the family member absolutely denies her reality right in front of her face, and no one else in her family respects her decision to change enough to stand up for her when this happens. So she's in agony every year as the season of holiday dinners turn around. Ok, so if I'm not mistaken you and I have been over this particular line of reasoning before. I think it really condenses down to a disagreement in our world views and how we choose to view the human condition. You seem to be putting forth a narrative that certain people who don't fit in to standards traditionally considered as "the norm" are routinely bullied, harassed, demeaned, and invalidated. While you failed to provide citations as to how prevalent this actually is, I think we can both agree that this obviously happens, and that it's wrong. So on that point, we agree. However, the next phase of your argument is where we disagree. You are espousing that using biologically correct pronouns when referring to someone who falsely believes that they can magically become the opposite gender is tantamount to bad treatment, a "trauma trigger" as you call it. I just don't agree with this, man. I think these people have built this narrative that "misgendering" them is some sort of grave insult, and that it hurts them to the core. Well, it really isn't. If you identify as a girl and I refer to you as "he/him", it doesn't hurt you at all. You can still pretend that you are a girl and that I am just a nut that can't see your obvious femininity. And gender isn't fluid, despite what you've been taught or what Hollywood or social media or government or whoever says. That's your misguided belief. Here's an article to help you understand the flaws of this movement's "logic". I also highlighted some key passages: www.heritage.org/gender/commentary/transgender-ideology-riddled-contradictions-here-are-the-big-onesRegardless of whether they identify as “cisgender” or “transgender,” the activists promote a highly subjective and incoherent worldview.
On the one hand, they claim that the real self is something other than the physical body, in a new form of Gnostic dualism, yet at the same time they embrace a materialist philosophy in which only the material world exists. They say that gender is purely a social construct, while asserting that a person can be “trapped” in the wrong gender.
They say there are no meaningful differences between man and woman, yet they rely on rigid sex stereotypes to argue that “gender identity” is real, while human embodiment is not. They claim that truth is whatever a person says it is, yet they believe there’s a real self to be discovered inside that person.
If gender is a social construct, how can gender identity be innate and immutable? How can one’s identity with respect to a social construct be determined by biology in the womb? How can one’s identity be unchangeable (immutable) with respect to an ever-changing social construct? And if gender identity is innate, how can it be “fluid”?So you met some (content removed) who whined and complained about how someone dared disagree with their position on this fantasy-land "gender is a social construct" crap. Now, armed with this anecdotal experience, you feel entitled to say that I am wreaking havoc on these poor, defenseless people simply because I am not playing their little game of pretend and calling them the name that they wish to be called. I wish that the worst that would happen to me in life is for someone to call me the wrong name. That would be an easy life. But when trans people are bullied, harrassed and beaten on the norm, they need you either shut the fuck up about what you think men and women are supposed to be, or to show some support to help put an end to a constant perpetuating cycle of abuse. And when you make these posts, you're not doing either of those things. And I will continue to do neither of those things. I'm not going to "shut the fuck up" as you say, because I have a right to speak just like anyone else. If you want to ban me for sharing my views on this topic, that's totally up to you, since you run this forum.
|
|
40oz
diRTbAg
Posts: 6,105
|
Post by 40oz on Apr 13, 2022 13:51:30 GMT -5
I just don't agree with this, man. I don't need help understanding the point of contention we're having here. It makes perfect sense to me. I know you don't agree with me. I'm telling you because you asked. The context of your posts admits indirectly that you don't know any transgender people who would confide in you with their experiences. I don't have to tell you what I know. I'm doing it out of respect for you in hopes you'll soon stop making yourself look further like a fool. I would never request a transgender person subject themselves to the way you'd treat them to their face when I can already see the way you speak about them when they're not around to defend themselves.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2022 14:17:04 GMT -5
However, the next phase of your argument is where we disagree. You are espousing that using biologically correct pronouns when referring to someone who falsely believes that they can magically become the opposite gender is tantamount to bad treatment, a "trauma trigger" as you call it. I just don't agree with this, man. I think these people have built this narrative that "misgendering" them is some sort of grave insult, and that it hurts them to the core. Well, it really isn't. If you identify as a girl and I refer to you as "he/him", it doesn't hurt you at all. You can still pretend that you are a girl and that I am just a nut that can't see your obvious femininity. The thing is, I believe this is where you are actually wrong. Not everyone has the moral capacity to dismiss other people's opinion about them, especially when engaging someone that has situational power over them (interacting with a guard at entrance, or a coworker in a company you can't just leave etc.). "To thyself only be true" is a good motto, but few people can actually uphold that in practice, and some may be even desperate for acceptance. And probably transgendered people, for whatever reason, may be statistically less able to do as you suggested. Unless, of course, they just have to dismiss some rude person stalking them on the street, which is an easy thing to do. Except even then, some teenagers get beaten for their long hair if they could just ran away, or just do a haircut because they're tired of being bullied even though they can run competitively - and thus have high chance to be able to escape from the situation if such need arises, and only need mental fortitude to ignore all the rest. In the latter case, we are not even talking transgendered people - looks like cisgender people (especially young ones) may have trouble dismissing negative feedback from total strangers. i.e. don't assume that everyone has the same capacity of dealing with adversity as you do. You are quite obviously a strong man, but not every person is that way.
|
|
40oz
diRTbAg
Posts: 6,105
|
Post by 40oz on Apr 13, 2022 14:52:04 GMT -5
For shits and gigs, I'll cut this article up real quick. First, I wanna reference this because it will be important as I go through this. 1 million people claiming to be transgender out of a population of 338 million is a massive amount. Just like you and me, we have very different reasons for being on doomer boards, and we've had our laughs watching doomworld attempt to lump us all into one singular cesspool of toxic individuals. I don't know how realistic it is that there are ~1,000,000 transgender people in the US. Its possible; I don't know. But if its anywhere near that high, the thought of simply othering all of their individual paths towards transitioning into into a single collective monolithic belief doctrine is seriously foolish when you can see how fucking weird this small forum is with just ourselves in it. You can see that, right? This isn't scientology here. It's not like a jehovah's witness cult that was designed to manipulate people into questioning their gender in pursuit of a better life. People started having this before they knew it was a real thing. they claim that the real self is something other than the physical body, in a new form of Gnostic dualism, yet at the same time they embrace a materialist philosophy in which only the material world exists. Some weird spiritual stuff that makes no sense. Sounds like the author is first trying to establish it as as an opposition to religion. I've never heard this, especially the second part from any transgender person or trans rights supporter I've ever talked to. They say that gender is purely a social construct, while asserting that a person can be “trapped” in the wrong gender. I don't understand the mutual exclusivity implied in this sentence. The creation of the social construct predates the movement. The construct subjects everyone to be in a binary gender model that is in line with their biological sex. People have been saying they are non-binary for a long time. They say there are no meaningful differences between man and woman, yet they rely on rigid sex stereotypes to argue that “gender identity” is real The clear and delineated differences between man and woman are already understood. They are imposed on us by the social fabric we're born into. The differences have to be addresssed as existing before the argument that can be made that they no longer need to. They claim that truth is whatever a person says it is, yet they believe there’s a real self to be discovered inside that person. There's the truth, and theres your truth, and they're both valid. There's agreed upon definitions for things, yes, but there's unique personal experiences for every person that aren't recorded anywhere. No one can possibly know everyone's truth. I don't really know anything about you, most of your posts are pretty much relegated to sharing opinions in line with the articles and statistics you reference, but you definitely have one and it's no ones right to deny it.
|
|
|
Post by dr_st on Apr 13, 2022 15:32:15 GMT -5
If you have lived the life of someone who has absolute disinterest in hobbies and activities and behaviors that have since been associated with culturally normalized gender roles associated with the sexually indentifiable organs they were born with, that often means you've had to suffer the experience of being bullied on the playground, in the classroom, at summer camp, by your classmates, by your teachers, by your church, by your counselors, by your aunts and uncles, and/or by your parents. You've been constantly questioned, provoked to change, prodded to explain yourself, your clothing style, the colors you like, the idols you have, the activities you enjoy, by pretty much everyone you meet. There are two possible solutions to this problem. One is to teach people that it is okay to be a boy who prefer behaviors more commonly associated with girls, or vice versa. The other way is to teach people that if they like "boyish" hobbies, it means they are a boy, even if they are clearly biologically female (and vice versa). The first option is liberal and humane. The second option is insane and just as oppressive and insulting as telling people that they are bad if they like things associated with the opposite gender. Can you guess which approach I prefer?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2022 21:29:09 GMT -5
dr_st The text you quoted by 40oz is within context of him trying to explain (to Bob Page) the load of trauma a transgendered person already carrys over from the past and why it's important not to add on top of it. Your position is humane up to a point - it would indeed be beneficial to reconstruct society so that there is less trauma for people who do not conform, but that is but one part of it. However, (in case you thought about that) you won't rid of transgenderism phenomena that way, as the list of what 40oz was not exhaustive, but just a slice of it. You should already know that my opinion is that radical lefties indeed have wrong idea how to help oppressed people in general, when I am talking about laws they make or narratives they push. That doesn't mean oppression doesn't exist, it doesn't mean that I believe oppression doesn't exist or is not significant, and in no way am I a proponent of "oppressed people deserve it" or "I don't care about oppressed people". I do that when I am certain their (activists' and politicians') actions have negative consequences they ignore, i.e. that don't actually solve the oppression but may push it on someone else instead. However, respecting and using pronouns which the person prefers to be addressed with, in my opinion, doesn't have those far-fetching negative consequences, and is a good practical and also cheap way I can do my part in not contributing to oppression.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2022 21:46:54 GMT -5
Also, the issue of the article is it lumps together: - scientific research on what transgenderism actually is, the causes of it, etc. which not only is ongoing but also requires utmost care in not making assumptions, classic error patterns like "equating correlation for causation" - messages addressed to general public which public may be skeptical about the need to change how they approach human interactions to address the negative impact they have on transgendered people, where the scientific position of not trying to make too much assumptions may be mistaken for lack of confidence/competence or difficult to understand
My personal experience with one local LGBTQ+ community in real-life shows that even they can lack proper insight / into transgenderism and offer inadequate help to transgendered people, as well as promote false narratives (through "friendly doctors" and interviews with some transgendered people no less!) which completely leave out some of their own former members without any support or even can make them even more stigmatized. I fought to change it, and I lost.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2022 23:54:36 GMT -5
Here's an article written by a liberal feminist woman, not some right-wing Fox news contributor. Below are some highlights: Was silencing women who say that transwomen are not women (and transmen are not men) a punishment that fits the “crime”? Should referring to a self-identified transwoman as “he,” even inadvertently, mean that women deserve to have online methods of communication (a vital tool for women, enabling them to participate in both public and private conversations) cut off? No.
As I began to let such thoughts sink in, I started to open myself up to listening to the women I had previously shut down. Further, I began to actually use my training, and did some research.
n studying various guidelines for health professionals, I found that the overriding message was the same: when it comes to trans-identified people, the situation is urgent. If you ask questions, you put the lives of vulnerable individuals at risk. It might already be too late! Affirmation is the only option, even if the interventions used on children and teens may lead to severe consequences, such as permanent infertility.
Like so many other women before me, I reached my “peak.” And finally, even though it may have taken a long time, I tipped, falling away from the beliefs ascribed by gender identity ideology, and onto firmer ground. I was no longer willing to “affirm” transgender individuals at any cost, especially if it cost us women’s rights. I was no longer willing to agree that the end (transitioning a teen) necessarily justifies the means (using scare tactics about suicide on parents). I was no longer willing to perceive every transgender person as made of finely spun glass, too fragile to be questioned, and capable of being broken by mere words. I was no longer willing to sacrifice truth and ethics for political correctness.
And, while I’m reluctant to call trans activism a “cult,” I’m aware of many disconcerting similarities: the absolute refusal to allow anyone to criticize issues; silencing, smearing, and ostracizing those who do ask questions (in this case, labeling them “transphobic”) about the ideology of transgenderism; and pressuring individuals (from parents to health professionals) to blindly adhere to the view that some people are “born in the wrong body,” and that the only way to “fix” this error is through medical intervention, such as puberty-suppressing drugs, cross-sex hormones, and various surgeries, rather than with psychological intervention. And, much like in a cult, those who push gender identity ideology discourage independent thought, and instead respond to requests for evidence and facts to support their beliefs with platitudes, mantras, and scare tactics, repeated over and over, until they become reality.And this article, some of which is sampled below: Gender identity can sound a lot like religious identity, which is determined by beliefs. But those beliefs don’t determine reality. Someone who identifies as a Christian believes that Jesus is the Christ. Someone who identifies as a Muslim believes that Muhammad is the Final Prophet. But Jesus either is or is not the Christ, and Muhammad either is or is not the Final Prophet, regardless of what anyone happens to believe. So, too, a person either is or is not a man, regardless of what anyone—including that person—happens to believe.
The challenge for transgender activists is to present an argument for why transgender beliefs determine reality. If gender identity is self-created, why must other people accept it as reality? If we should be free to choose our own gender reality, why can some people impose their idea of reality on others just because they identify as transgender? Another challenge for the transgender activist is to articulate some conception of truth as the basis for how we understand the common good and how society should be ordered.
Transgendered men do not become women, nor do transgendered women become men. All (including Bruce Jenner) become feminized men or masculinized women, counterfeits or impersonators of the sex with which they ‘identify.’ In that lies their problematic future. When ‘the tumult and shouting dies,’ it proves not easy nor wise to live in a counterfeit sexual garb. The most thorough follow-up of sex-reassigned people—extending over thirty years and conducted in Sweden, where the culture is strongly supportive of the transgendered—documents their lifelong mental unrest. Ten to fifteen years after surgical reassignment, the suicide rate of those who had undergone sex-reassignment surgery rose to twenty times that of comparable peers.
Transgender ideologues ignore contrary evidence and competing interests; they disparage alternative practices; and they aim to muffle skeptical voices and shut down any disagreement. The movement has to keep patching and shoring up its beliefs, policing the faithful, coercing the heretics, and punishing apostates, because as soon as its furious efforts flag for a moment or someone successfully stands up to it, the whole charade is exposed. A transgender future is not the “right side of history,” yet activists have convinced the most powerful sectors of our society to acquiesce to their demands. While the claims they make are manifestly false, it will take real work to prevent the spread of these harmful ideas.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2022 0:10:20 GMT -5
Ok. I am stepping down from this discussion, as I don't believe than any side is willing to change their opinion. I stand firm that they were not men or women to begin with, they were already 'impersonators' of the sex assigned at birth as well if you are that way concerned. But of course impersonation either way should not be concerning, because there ought to be no fucking mandate on being true to society's made up characteristics of how "men" and "women" should or are expected to behave. Individuals should be true to themselves, not to some fucking gender roles. And the variety between individuals is far greater than between just two gender roles.
I had enough of this fruitless talk, I am out.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2022 1:28:19 GMT -5
These people claim to be "women", yet cannot define the term. Because it's universally stated by everybody that biology lessons are fucking boring. Actually, they aren't, but the main issue there is that most of the people have no interest in this, they don't want nor need to know of what each body cell of human body is made of, or how photosyntesis goes in plat based life forms (you'd argue that soy consoomers and vegans become the living plants, I disagree with that, but their intellectual capabilities truly show otherwise and that's hilarious) Should we rewrite all laws on the books to include the 37 genders that Facebook allows one to select? 37?! O_O The fuck? Which is fucking stupid, I would like to try to find out how reality works. Fuck around and find out. That's how it works all the time. But seriously, reality is... quite a questionable thing. See, some people believe that, what the clownworld we live today it just can't be fucking real, in regards of how utterly retarded everything is going on right now, like you take the system that is deeply corrupted by a lot of bonziebuddy.exe copies that are much, MUCH MORE cancerous than the original, and can actually fuck up your system to a degree that re-install would be impossible due to hardware damage. But that's just some crazy theory, lol... right? And yet, it's not surprising at all that we see increasing numbers of young people heading in this direction. Well let's be honest here, suicide isn't a good option there either. And bettering (is such a word exist, even?) themselves, to become better versions of themselves or who they should be by the matter of fact is too hard and exhausting for many, if not everyone. So of course they choosing the most retarded and life altering way. Without a back thought that there will be no undoing to this, that's a permanent change that, if they would want to get back to their original, biological gender, they would not be able to do it in full, because motherfuckers haven't thought about long term consequences. By the way, *wall of text nonsence* Hey buddy, have you been bitten by major arlene recently? Cuz it shows that you have. Ouch.
|
|
xeepeep
Banned
Forever
Posts: 2,338
|
Post by xeepeep on Apr 14, 2022 3:03:28 GMT -5
I wish I was.
|
|
|
Post by mayhemicdestrvctor on Apr 14, 2022 7:17:10 GMT -5
dont let major arlene confuse you
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2022 18:47:42 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2022 4:09:36 GMT -5
58... genders... FUCKING HOW?!
|
|