Why did you get banned from doomworld?

Basically, being pushed on pre-defined paths fixed by your origins (not just sex, but also other things) sucks. I believe in allowing people to pursue their own individual destinies, in fact I pretty much see the point in existence only if such destiny is personal, otherwise life has no value to me. To follow your own path is to be alive, everything else is worse than never having existed in first place.

P.S. My negative attitude towards identity politics - both left and right - also comes from the maxim above about personal destiny.

1. Trans people have been around for the longest time. They're not infiltrating shit -- you're just seeing them now.
2. Unlike the absolutely un-retarded narrative that modern medical science is completely incorrect regarding trans people, but has in fact been completely compromised from the inside out?
3. "No actual reason?" I think the dehumanization that's been on display in this thread (and other places on this forum) is reason enough to get upset.
4. "You are a disgusting freak and unironically deserve to die alone" is not "black humor," it's just cruelty.
5. I don't give a fuck what you think is nasty or not re: anything that has to even remotely touch this topic, because it's clear that you so violently and fundamentally hate trans people that there's no actual perspective to be had.

They were, sure. Point is that when they reach the critical mass they start to be loud and demanding. I saw this happening quite a lot of times, including doom servers. I'm tired of this shit. One of my pals got his discord server nuked because some whiny trannie got offended by his refusal to "fix" his PERSONAL server to fit them.
2.


Why do I need to repeat myself here?


You clearly haven't read what I have wrote in the point 3, have you.
I get you an example: a dispute got born between a bunch of people. one of them is, obviously, "bigot, transphobe". He's "bigot, transhobe" because he refused to agree with a statement that certain subject of dispute is trans tribute. Frankly, the subject of this dispute really doesn't, it's just a thing on its own, for good\bad\whatever reasons, really.


You mismatch humor with obvious troll poke.

Oh, no... what shall I do... anyway.
I'm sure when you'll get your own "egg hatching" moment in family you'll not be that happy to support trans movement.

Don't let internet interactions from people with problems sway you from supporting people IRL who have the same problems. Generalizing an entire gender orientation just because of a few internet interactions is a sure recipe for blind hatred. Don't look for support from the internet either, look for support where it matters.

I clearly said "have the ability to birth a child".  I did not say "have already birthed a child".  Troll harder, bud.

Please, oh please, show me where I advocated for humiliating and beating up trans people.  You can't, because I never did.


You do this all the time when you argue, and everyone sees right through it.  You've assigned your own idea of who I am and what I want to happen before you even type the first word.  It honestly says a lot about you, man.  You really don't know as much about people as you think you do.  All I'm saying is that these people can believe whatever they want, but just because they believe something in their diseased brains doesn't mean the rest of us have to entertain or contribute to their fantasy.  I can pretend I'm a ninja from feudal Japan, or a muskrat, or an Apache helicopter, but why should you have to humor me?  This is my point.  If they really wanted to just "live and let live", we wouldn't be getting "Respect mah pronouns!!!11!!1" shoved down our throats every time we hear from these idiots.

I fail to see how this equates.  CIS people aren't trying to pretend to be something that their basic biology and every cell in their body is saying that they are not.  Calling them by correct pronouns isn't giving dignity and respect, it's using the correct terminology.

This video should end the entire debate, once and for all.  Matt's logic here is airtight.  These people claim to be "women", yet cannot define the term.

They literally say in the video "I do not define as a woman"

Even though it is technically true that some women exist without female reproductive organs, whether because of a birth defect or because of surgery, there is only one sex of humans that is genetically programmed to have the capability to bear offspring.  Those are women.  They have XX chromosomes.  So, without being pedantic and resorting to nitpicking like a retard, we can define women as human females - i.e. those members of the human race that, due to their genetics(XX chromosomes), should have the capability to bear offspring.  Of course, in some rare instances there will be women without this ability, but we still know that they are women because of their other defining characteristics(again, XX chromosomes).  The implication of the transgender cult is that there is this massive group of people who were assigned a wrong body at birth.  That's simply not true.  We don't define terms in a language with the outliers and rarities in mind, we define terms that cover 99.999% of people.  Should we rewrite all laws on the books to include the 37 genders that Facebook allows one to select?  It's madness.

I'd agree that people who are able to give birth are women, yes. But it's not an if and only if statement. I'd also agree that every bicycle has two wheels, but not every object that has two wheels is a bicycle. Every person who can give birth is a woman, but not every woman can give birth.


Same issue here. Every person with only two X chromosomes are women. But not every woman has only two X chromosomes, some have three and they still can give birth. If you wanna define sex by using chromosomes, we would have 5 different sexes, namely; xy, xx, xxx, xxy and xyy. All these combinations can exist. And that would mean multiple sexes are able to give birth. So your argument of only women can give birth would fall apart then.


honestly this just reads like, I cant properly define my definitions or I can't properly defend my definition, so let's not talk about the details. But details make or break a definition. If we have a discussion like that, I can just end it with "A woman is something, don't sweat the details", which is even more retarded.




This is something I never heard of or experienced irl or on the internet. Most people I meet are not like this at all, this seems more that you are just creating strawmen for whatever fucking reason.



Which is fucking stupid, I would like to try to find out how reality works. If that means that we make defining things more difficult because nature often works with outliers and rarities, then we should just deal with that. I am not gonna redefine how nature works just to make it easier on our monkey brains.


I think we can atleast find some common ground and agree that facebook is fucking cancer, regardless off gender politics.



Matt barely defined anything himself, he just mentioned female reproductive organs and bone density, both of which are just weak-ass definition. Not every woman has female reproductive organs like we just said and not all women has a lower bone density than all men. Most women do, sure, but if you talk only talk about most it will not be clearly defined term, so fuck that.

oh princess... look. youre probably gonna remain composed soon into this post because to do other wise would make you look like a total sissy and youre gonna want people to think youre macho right now so the men can take your little cosplay act seriously.

Or not, you can scream and cry into your pillow all about it -- its none of my business.

Let me use an analogy you would be familiar with. When theres a fire in the kitchen, right in front of you, your inaction is an action. Its not normal for you just stand there and say I dont need to do anything because you didnt start it. You certainly did because face it, women are always screwing things up...
The problem needs to be dealt with.

Furthermore, this topic of respecting peoples pronouns that youre breaking a nail over is really silly. My bros here already know that having your pronouns 'respected' is mutually understood by everyone at all times without it needing to be earned. You dont always notice it until people take it away from you, right hun? See, the men here are talking and your incessant nagging is a lot. you don't need to keep bitching about it. In fact, try this, sweetie. Heres how i can tell youre just being all hormonal and emotional and feelingshurt. Look up someone who identifies as a woman on doomworld, and search their entire post history for the words "respect my pronouns." you can come back to this convo when youve found a single post saying that. your just hearing things you want to hear instead of receiving it with logic and reasoning.

Now next time you need to yap yap yap maybe you could gossip to your other sisters about it. you sound like you could use a girls night anyway.

By the way, people would listen to you more if you just smile. its not a good look on you. Youre not fooling anyone Bob, with that macho name. its not at all attractive. its just sneaky and weird. why don't you want to come off pretty to the boys? i can tell you're a girl even when you think you need to prance around with a picture of a man in your profile. its not gonna somehow convince me to listen to you ya know.