nnn✓ork
Doomer
Dr. Noisystein
Posts: 719
|
Post by nnn✓ork on Dec 14, 2023 15:37:56 GMT -5
Nazi's were a political party back in 1940's, now it is a slur for "person I disagree with online". The shortest voltage path to release cognitive dissonance in an internet disagreement seems to be to just call them a "nazi". Also, in everyone's minds: "Slurs are bad... except for the ones I like using!" It's not a paradox of intolerance (that concept doesn't even make any sense), it's a space management issue at best. You don't need it all bleeding together. I agree with scubasteve 's main point that Cacoward writers can do whatever they want, it's their magazine... until things get into the creepy underhanded encroachment part of things, or the "don't be 'antisocial', btw we define what that is; also we don't like how you are socializing I mean anti-socializing in your bar!". As far as a denominator goes, it's a 'tree of life' at best, not an 'egalitarian neomarxist pancake of life' that is poorly defined by whoever has the most institutional power. Maybe some branches are parallel at the same level, and risk entanglement with one another; But sometimes a higher branch curls downward and tries digging into lower part of the stack itself like an ingrown toe-nail. (And everyone has their own opinion on what each branch is doing and where they are located in the tree... I can give my own opinion if I really have to, but don't want to unpack that right now...) Anyways, we can slice-and-dice and make laundry lists all day. For fun: -Doomerboards: has teenage Russian clowns with sailor's mouths. has an occasional Wereknight who burned all his olive branches after a couple years of being harassed, and seems to have become borderline violent now; and other stuff. -Doomworld: has people who identify as 'ends justify the means' domestic terrorists. has people who think someone should be removed from society for going to an art convention they don't like, and also has one prized person who said they would hire a 'h*tm*n' on their political enemies if they won the lotto (not active at the moment, and had to go a couple years back for this one); and other stuff. Meh.
|
|
|
Post by deathevokation on Dec 14, 2023 15:38:43 GMT -5
American politics and Americans with their shitty 1 dimensional black and white views of politics tear so many fandoms apart and leave gaping holes and doubt where once the credibility of said fandoms were unquestioned.. hell they even tear their families apart over disagreements.. this is not normal behaviour btw..
|
|
nnn✓ork
Doomer
Dr. Noisystein
Posts: 719
|
Post by nnn✓ork on Dec 14, 2023 15:39:28 GMT -5
On the silly side:
I nominate SS Steve for a Literally Hitler.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2023 15:47:51 GMT -5
some slavs also have a nazi complex tbh, never really understood why they like identifying as subhumans. on the other hand russia seems to have inherited roman ethics, which is cool
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2023 15:50:37 GMT -5
|
|
Gokuma
You're trying to say you like DOS better than me, right?
Resident DB English Teacher
Posts: 1,208
|
Post by Gokuma on Dec 14, 2023 17:22:40 GMT -5
Ha, I was just thinking of posting that exact same Dead Kennedys song.
Funny some slanderous idiots are calling us nazi punks. I also wanted to post this really good version of Nazi Punks Fuck off where Jello gives a good intro saying it doesn't matter what you look like like, it matters what's in your head, and some people are fascist in the head. The DW staff are really fascist in the head and it applies perfectly to them. Unfortunately I can't find that version on youtube.
|
|
|
Post by thundercunt on Dec 14, 2023 17:36:37 GMT -5
More to the point, it is entirely up to them to decide what gets into the Cacowards or not.
Excellent point. Cacowards have always been about whatever DW writers think deserve publicity, not a representation of the community's preference. It is their website, they don't own anyone anything and if they give the 2024 awards to a bunch of terrywads, that wouldn't be anyone business. They always have been subtle about this practice, but it seems that this is the first time DW mods explicitly stated the quality of projects are a secondary requirement for winning a cacoward - what really matters is the author not being declared a pariah by them. Even Doomwiki.org states that NeoDoom has not won a cacoward because of problems the author had with DW moderation; and that was back in 2006.
And speaking of Brazilians, the largest Brazilian Doom community was founded because some people were unfairly banned from DW. The consensus among the Brazilian and Spanish-speaking Latin American doom community was that DW forums were an extremely discriminatory place where Latin Americans were not welcome. But that was 15 or some years ago. Discrimination against people from shithole countries is no longer considered cool; immigrants are welcome, and nazi punks are to be segregated.
My point being: this entire thread is silly and feels like 9 pages of people butthurt because they didn't get recognition by DW retards. Who gives a shit? DBPs are extremely popular among the community; was that because of DW's validation, or because of the immense quality of the releases? Let Doomer Boards create their own awards instead.
|
|
|
Post by lunchlunch on Dec 14, 2023 17:46:32 GMT -5
I've not touched forum drama for awhile because DOOM drama is embarrassing and I myself have no allegiance to a website, whether that's DW, DB, or /vr/.
I enjoy the cacowards, they're good recommendations, the reviews are lovingly well-written, and I'm grateful I've had a couple wads receive a fair amount of attention by being showcased. I think it's cringe when people cry about X or Y not getting a cacoward, it's a bad look, and I don't understand when outsiders feel the need to crusade on behalf of the DBPs for us. Some DB guys are being pretty cringe in this thread, being spiteful, showing off their power levels, or especially those of you posting chat logs and engaging in your own forms of tattletaling (look at what this person said, ostracize them!).
With that said, it's so tiresome to still hear the word "Nazi" be thrown around willy-nilly. Something I've thought lately is that these types tend to throw that word more often at "imperfect allies" like myself (someone who shares 60% of their values but not 100%) than they do at their political opponents, much less anyone that actually in any way resembles a fascist. I expect that sort of thing from those types by now but it is exhausting that it's still happening. The only thing that possibly resembles bigotry on this site is some of the trans stuff and while I might not personally agree with it, oftentimes I'd rather post somewhere people are allowed to speak their mind without any worry that my post will be deleted, the thread will be shut down, or that I will otherwise be put in time-out. But at the end of the day, even if you're super pro-trans, you should be able to see that these guys are at worst being impolite in misgendering someone, they're not calling for trans genocide like an actual fascist might, they're usually just blowing off steam about something they're not allowed to criticize anywhere else.
If you're upset about naughty words and don't want them said in your community, that's well and good. But when you come into someone else's house and you hear them using language you don't like, understand that it doesn't necessarily make them a hateful person. Sometimes, among friends, I call things "retarded." There's no hate there. I spent around six years working at a group home, taking care of disabled people, befriending them, feeding them, tucking them into bed, wiping their ass, taking them out into the community, teaching them life-skills, loving them, laughing with them, performing mouth-to-mouth CPR and literally saving ones life, et cetera. I'll never forget, there was one person from high school who was pretty vocal about "spread the word to end the word." One time, years after high school, I had taken my client to a restaurant and they were having a bad day, they started spazzing and causing a scene, getting violent, and I had no choice but to restrain them in the middle of the restaurant. I remember seeing this person from high school there and they were rolling their eyes at me as if to say: Why would you even bring that thing out in public? Why don't you just keep them locked up and medicated where people don't have to look at them? And that told me everything I need to know about someone who cares more about words than intentions.
I don't even know why I bother, I don't come out looking good to anyone here- DB gonna be upset about my indifference to DBP's caco-eligibility, DW gonna be upset about my tolerance for intolerance, any anon from /vr/ is just gonna see a dramawhore. 40oz absolutely was great at reigning in the circus and I'm missing that a lot right now.
Edit- This is all I have to say on the subject. Back to DOOM.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2023 18:09:49 GMT -5
doomworld has certainly slighted him big time, but that's on him to even care about it... i don't think anyone really should i admit i did my best to run this thread into the ground, so i'm quoting the only relevant part just in case
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2023 18:40:40 GMT -5
I've not touched forum drama for awhile because DOOM drama is embarrassing and I myself have no allegiance to a website, whether that's DW, DB, or /vr/. I enjoy the cacowards, they're good recommendations, the reviews are lovingly well-written, and I'm grateful I've had a couple wads receive a fair amount of attention by being showcased. I think it's cringe when people cry about X or Y not getting a cacoward, it's a bad look, and I don't understand when outsiders feel the need to crusade on behalf of the DBPs for us. Some DB guys are being pretty cringe in this thread, being spiteful, showing off their power levels, or especially those of you posting chat logs and engaging in your own forms of tattletaling ( look at what this person said, ostracize them!). With that said, it's so tiresome to still hear the word "Nazi" be thrown around willy-nilly. Something I've thought lately is that these types tend to throw that word more often at "imperfect allies" like myself (someone who shares 60% of their values but not 100%) than they do at their political opponents, much less anyone that actually in any way resembles a fascist. I expect that sort of thing from those types by now but it is exhausting that it's still happening. The only thing that possibly resembles bigotry on this site is some of the trans stuff and while I might not personally agree with it, oftentimes I'd rather post somewhere people are allowed to speak their mind without any worry that my post will be deleted, the thread will be shut down, or that I will otherwise be put in time-out. But at the end of the day, even if you're super pro-trans, you should be able to see that these guys are at worst being impolite in misgendering someone, they're not calling for trans genocide like an actual fascist might, they're usually just blowing off steam about something they're not allowed to criticize anywhere else. If you're upset about naughty words and don't want them said in your community, that's well and good. But when you come into someone else's house and you hear them using language you don't like, understand that it doesn't necessarily make them a hateful person. Sometimes, among friends, I call things "retarded." There's no hate there. I spent around six years working at a group home, taking care of disabled people, befriending them, feeding them, tucking them into bed, wiping their ass, taking them out into the community, teaching them life-skills, loving them, laughing with them, performing mouth-to-mouth CPR and literally saving ones life, et cetera. I'll never forget, there was one person from high school who was pretty vocal about "spread the word to end the word." One time, years after high school, I had taken my client to a restaurant and they were having a bad day, they started spazzing and causing a scene, getting violent, and I had no choice but to restrain them in the middle of the restaurant. I remember seeing this person from high school there and they were rolling their eyes at me as if to say: Why would you even bring that thing out in public? Why don't you just keep them locked up and medicated where people don't have to look at them? And that told me everything I need to know about someone who cares more about words than intentions. I don't even know why I bother, I don't come out looking good to anyone here- DB gonna be upset about my indifference to DBP's caco-eligibility, DW gonna be upset about my tolerance for intolerance, any anon from /vr/ is just gonna see a dramawhore. 40oz absolutely was great at reigning in the circus and I'm missing that a lot right now. Edit- This is all I have to say on the subject. Back to DOOM. Quantifying allegiance or bias based on a qualitative analysis of a text can be somewhat subjective, as it involves interpreting the nuances and emphases of the author's statements. However, I can attempt to assign values to each point made by the author and estimate their allegiance as a percentage.
1. **Avoiding Forum Drama** (Neutral, 0% bias)
2. **Appreciation for Cacowards** (Slightly favors DW due to Cacowards association, 20% DW bias)
3. **Criticizing Community Behavior** (Neutral, 0% bias)
4. **Frustration with Misuse of "Nazi" Term** (Neutral, 0% bias)
5. **Views on Free Speech and Trans Issues** (Neutral, 0% bias)
6. **Perspective on Offensive Language** (Neutral, 0% bias)
7. **Self-Reflection on Community Perception** (Neutral, 0% bias)
8. **Missing a Key Community Figure** (Neutral, 0% bias)
9. **Conclusion and Return to Focus on DOOM** (Neutral, 0% bias)
Based on these assessments, the overall bias would be slightly in favor of Doomworld (DW), primarily due to their appreciation for the Cacowards, which is associated with DW. However, most of their points are neutral with respect to allegiance between DW and DB.
So, if we calculate the average, considering the slight DW bias in point 2:
- DW Bias: 20% for point 2, 0% for all other points.
- Average DW Bias: \( \frac{20\%}{9} \) = approximately 2.22%.
Therefore, the author's allegiance could be quantified as roughly 2.22% in favor of Doomworld, with 97.78% neutrality or no clear bias towards either DW or DB. This approach is highly interpretative and should be taken as an approximation rather than a definitive measure.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2023 18:41:00 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2023 18:48:59 GMT -5
As the creator of Doomer Boards I will say this: I don't give a fuck about the Cacowards.Also, it is high time we have our own awards, come on people! This website was created as an alternative to that site, so don't give legitimacy to their standards. Also Scuba Steve seems like a real douche for taking that position. To quantify your allegiance based on the provided statement, I will assign values to each point and calculate the percentage of bias towards Doomer Boards (DB) and against Doomworld (DW) or the Cacowards:
1. **Indifference to Cacowards** (100% against Cacowards/Doomworld)
2. **Advocacy for Independent Recognition** (100% in favor of Doomer Boards)
3. **Desire for Autonomy and Distinction** (100% in favor of Doomer Boards)
4. **Critical View of Community Figures** (100% against Doomworld-associated individuals)
Based on these assignments:
- For Doomer Boards: Points 2 and 3 show a strong bias in favor of DB, so (100% + 100%) / 2 = 100%.
- Against Cacowards/Doomworld: Points 1 and 4 show a strong bias against Cacowards/Doomworld, so (100% + 100%) / 2 = 100%.
Therefore, your allegiance can be quantified as 100% in favor of Doomer Boards and 100% against the standards or recognition associated with Doomworld and the Cacowards. This analysis indicates a complete alignment with the interests and independence of Doomer Boards, coupled with a complete rejection of the values or accolades of Doomworld and its associated Cacowards.
|
|
StodgyAyatollah
Doomer
I'm not here. You're just imagining things.
Posts: 504
|
Post by StodgyAyatollah on Dec 14, 2023 18:54:09 GMT -5
Let Doomer Boards create their own awards instead. Fair point. Either celebrate your own community and build on that or dwell in a self imposed shadow. I remember seeing this person from high school there and they were rolling their eyes at me as if to say: Why would you even bring that thing out in public? Why don't you just keep them locked up and medicated where people don't have to look at them? And that told me everything I need to know about someone who cares more about words than intentions. I've had people try to force me to move a patient having a seizure out of their way because the one chair, out of dozens was where they wanted to sit. The disgust in peoples eyes as they look at someone bleeding out because a blocked entrance is a minor inconvenience to them. A crowd trying to walk over someone in diabetic shock just so they can get into a buffet and gorge themselves. I know that feeling all to well. No real point in me saying this but yeah, it sucks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2023 19:01:27 GMT -5
Bangladesh
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2023 19:03:00 GMT -5
I'm surprised nobody here has created a thread discussing this year's ceremony. Maybe the forums no longer care about them or view them as a joke? Regardless, what are your guy's thoughts on this year's cacowards? Also, it includes a screenshot of Scuba Steve explaining why he chose to omit the Doomer boards projects from this year's and all future cacowards. To formulate arguments against Scuba Steve's position, one would generally focus on principles of inclusivity, fairness, and the value of diverse perspectives in a community. Here are some potential arguments that could be made:
1. **Inclusivity Over Exclusivity**: A community should strive to be inclusive rather than exclusive. By not recognizing works based on the perceived behavior of their creators rather than the merit of the works themselves, a community risks fostering an environment of exclusivity.
2. **Separation of Work and Creator**: The quality of a project should be evaluated independently of its creators' personal behaviors or attitudes. This separation ensures that works are judged fairly and solely on their own merits.
3. **Diversity of Opinions**: Healthy communities thrive on a diversity of opinions and perspectives. By excluding certain projects, a community may be limiting itself and not representing the full spectrum of creativity within its niche.
4. **Transparency in Decision-Making**: Decisions affecting the community should be made with transparency. If projects are excluded for reasons other than their content, the criteria and process for these decisions should be clear and open to community scrutiny.
5. **Potential for Reform**: People and communities can change and improve over time. A punitive approach that does not allow for the possibility of reform might discourage positive changes in behavior.
6. **Consistency in Enforcement**: If the policy is inconsistently applied, it could be argued that this is unfair and that all community members and their projects should be subject to the same standards.
7. **Impact on Community Morale**: Excluding certain projects or communities can have a negative impact on overall community morale and could lead to a divisive atmosphere.
8. **Freedom of Expression**: Some may argue that freedom of expression should be upheld, and that moderating content based on behavior rather than the content itself is a form of censorship that undermines this principle.
9. **Economic Implications**: Awards can have significant economic implications for creators, in terms of both recognition and potential revenue. Excluding certain projects from awards can therefore have an undue negative economic impact on the creators.
Each of these arguments would need to be carefully considered and backed up with examples and evidence to create a strong case against Scuba Steve's position. It is also important to argue respectfully and constructively to foster dialogue rather than conflict.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2023 19:13:54 GMT -5
Each of these arguments would need to be carefully considered and backed up with examples and evidence to create a strong case against Scuba Steve's position. It is also important to argue respectfully and constructively to foster dialogue rather than conflict.
scubasteveI know I have presented myself in a hostile and strident way. But perhaps I was a bit defensive about being accused of shit I didn't even say or do, which is a direct affront to me and others.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2023 19:22:10 GMT -5
SEPARATION OF WOKE AND CREATOR LMAOOO to be quite perfectly honest fam... anything that throws shade at this sort of people is objectively good for any community, even though in this case they've basically done so themselves and we've mostly showed retardation and cringe behavior while blindly firing at our mystic vision of daisy the rabbit, certainly out of less than noble sentiments. it's one step at a time though. i guess i respect the "any community drama is cringe behavior" perspective, but that certainly doesn't only entail these particular boards. in fact this bullshit almost came out of nowhere, they didn't have to actually admit anything lmao. seems a deliberate slight on their part that backfired honestly
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2023 20:09:45 GMT -5
Ever heard of the Nazi bar dilemma? Yeah, this kind of attitude is exactly how DB becomes a cesspool of slurs and wretched people. And considering the behaviour that constantly reinforces this by fighting on the right side of this "culture war" or whatever the fuck you want to call it (by the way, your "gamer words" filters must not work at all, if slurs, censored or not, somehow managed to be posted with no issues), it's no surprise then that people will not only avoid the Doomer Boards, but outright warn about it. Call it leftist or liberal bullshit, cancel culture, call it whatever you want: it's common sense. Nobody wants to be around people who shit on minorities for no real reason unless you believe these minorities should be put back in the closet, killed, thrown in jail, etc, and the only way this will change is if there's a complete restructuring of Doomer Boards. I would like to see you list examples. Because right now it seems like you're just using buzzwords to paint the forum and it's userbase negatively; Which is pretty much liberal bullshit. Not doing yourself any favours.
|
|
xhelal
I'm too young to die
Posts: 9
|
Post by xhelal on Dec 15, 2023 6:44:01 GMT -5
there is one thing in particular i was curious about as someone who used to play neodoom back on st days. Even Doomwiki.org states that NeoDoom has not won a cacoward because of problems the author had with DW moderation; and that was back in 2006.
doomwiki.org does not state this, i have also not seen this on the wikia version, so i am curious where this rumour originates from because nothing i can find seems to back this up...
i was told, time ago, that neodoom had simply fallen through the cracks in 2006 as it was quite difficult to keep track of wads not that known outside of doomworld forums at the time. neodoom's popularity was a big thing in skulltag but idk about elsewhere. also it had that whole big balance issue with the vixens that even neodoom fans have been super critical of.
also i can see neodoom is mentioned in the music feature from this year, if they really didn't want to award the author i doubt they'd have done it now. so yeah idk, neodoom has been brought up multiple times in this thread and it seems that people are following some rumor that does not originate from a wiki or whatever.
|
|
StodgyAyatollah
Doomer
I'm not here. You're just imagining things.
Posts: 504
|
Post by StodgyAyatollah on Dec 15, 2023 7:52:52 GMT -5
there is one thing in particular i was curious about as someone who used to play neodoom back on st days. Even Doomwiki.org states that NeoDoom has not won a cacoward because of problems the author had with DW moderation; and that was back in 2006.
doomwiki.org does not state this, i have also not seen this on the wikia version, so i am curious where this rumour originates from because nothing i can find seems to back this up...
i was told, time ago, that neodoom had simply fallen through the cracks in 2006 as it was quite difficult to keep track of wads not that known outside of doomworld forums at the time. neodoom's popularity was a big thing in skulltag but idk about elsewhere. also it had that whole big balance issue with the vixens that even neodoom fans have been super critical of.
also i can see neodoom is mentioned in the music feature from this year, if they really didn't want to award the author i doubt they'd have done it now. so yeah idk, neodoom has been brought up multiple times in this thread and it seems that people are following some rumor that does not originate from a wiki or whatever.
This sort of points out what may be the underlining issue. I'll be honest that I could care less who does or doesn't win. I don't even have a problem with DW being ran the way it is outside of personal distaste. My biggest issue is the drama and vitriol that fuels the othering and the demonization without any meaningful deceleration. I'm okay with a little cross site jabbing but you'd think we were in a life and death struggle with how worked up people get over it. In regards to the cacowards It has been made clear that works will be omitted from consideration for reasons outside of the work itself. Specifically social considerations. If it was clearly defined what would exclude a work from consideration that would at least cut down on some of the speculation and drama. Without a clearly defined restrictions this sort of speculation, rumors or whatever will be a specter hanging over it. My advice to those running the awards would be to clearly define such things in the future. To think about the limits you wish to have and articulate them in a way that is clear for all. It would be a benefit to you and others. Certainly won't fix everything but I think it would be a step to cool down at least some of the BS. Probably won't happen but I've said my piece.
|
|
|
Post by thundercunt on Dec 15, 2023 7:54:37 GMT -5
there is one thing in particular i was curious about as someone who used to play neodoom back on st days. Even Doomwiki.org states that NeoDoom has not won a cacoward because of problems the author had with DW moderation; and that was back in 2006.
doomwiki.org does not state this, i have also not seen this on the wikia version, so i am curious where this rumour originates from because nothing i can find seems to back this up...
i was told, time ago, that neodoom had simply fallen through the cracks in 2006 as it was quite difficult to keep track of wads not that known outside of doomworld forums at the time. neodoom's popularity was a big thing in skulltag but idk about elsewhere. also it had that whole big balance issue with the vixens that even neodoom fans have been super critical of.
also i can see neodoom is mentioned in the music feature from this year, if they really didn't want to award the author i doubt they'd have done it now. so yeah idk, neodoom has been brought up multiple times in this thread and it seems that people are following some rumor that does not originate from a wiki or whatever.
This was stated in ZDoom wiki, my bad zdoom.org/wiki/NeoDoom
|
|
xhelal
I'm too young to die
Posts: 9
|
Post by xhelal on Dec 15, 2023 9:17:40 GMT -5
ah thx, now i see where this originates from. zdoom wiki from what i have heard is quite outdated and unmoderated, with plenty of dubious claims even if in this case the edit dates to daniel himself from 2009. still like i said given neodoom is featured at the cacowards2023 i guess there was no controversy with the author and the cacowards specifically even if some stuff may have happened elsewhere on the forum. i do find the neodoom music weird since half of is midi, but featuring it for this music special made sense to me given not many wads even now rely on nonmidi music files.
|
|
|
Post by thundercunt on Dec 15, 2023 10:19:32 GMT -5
ah thx, now i see where this originates from. zdoom wiki from what i have heard is quite outdated and unmoderated, with plenty of dubious claims even if in this case the edit dates to daniel himself from 2009. still like i said given neodoom is featured at the cacowards2023 i guess there was no controversy with the author and the cacowards specifically even if some stuff may have happened elsewhere on the forum. i do find the neodoom music weird since half of is midi, but featuring it for this music special made sense to me given not many wads even now rely on nonmidi music files. I don't see any reason to dismiss Daniel's claims considering DW's history. For 2006 standards NeoDoom was absolutely astonishing and for some mysterious reason it was completely ignored at the cacowards. I'm pretty sure it was posted on DW forums so I doubt they were unaware of it. It was even ignored on the 2018 25 Missed Cacowards; this 2023 inclusion sounds more like a sad "hey guys, we finally acknowledged NeoDoom after 17 fucking years, look how positive we are xD" thing.
|
|
xhelal
I'm too young to die
Posts: 9
|
Post by xhelal on Dec 15, 2023 11:27:50 GMT -5
that is fair, altho daniel's own edit presents it as a doubtful thing, and also with the vixens being the way they were i'm not surprised many people thought it was not good. however apparently a patch that removes the custom monsters has since been released, if i boot up zandronum again i'll be sure to give that a shot since i do agree the wad can be pretty astonishing in many ways. i honestly recommend people here to play it too because it still has some of the best custom texture use i recall in a megawad.
|
|
|
Post by picks-a-tool on Dec 15, 2023 13:40:58 GMT -5
I echo sentiments of accordance here and applaud you on such as long as it applies to everyone else but me.
I also believe that yes, one could argue that someone being rejected even by DW's rejects makes such person quite a mental case by default. And.. well, that's some morning wood solidness of a claim for me to try and debunk. I can't pick that fight so I concede the metaphorical hill here.
However! What I can in fact assert is that I was never touched by the scot prose-writter (I'm not implying any desire for it to happen tho - british aren't my thing, howbeit I can't deny that those old timers sporting wigs & gavels had a distinct sex appeal for sure).
Also, as far as body counts goes, victims of the all-time Tarn Adams' simp includes (but are not limited to):
* the prophet mayhemic (Peace Be Upon Him) * the russian enforcer (kinda miss you but not really)
... and (since such person seems to bear the memory of a goldfish) none other than you, KK - whom evaded the given imputation and accused the Dwarf Fortress enthusiast of treason. All water under the bridge now, thankfully, bold maneuver still. Overall: 7,5/10 shitshow.
In any case, if only to further indulge us in good spirits I do wonder about a plausible causal sequence soon to follow after congress aproval of said policy.
Say, african-american nation, if one was capable of making a compelling case and frame thy posting style as schizo - would you then kick yourself in the rear for consistency sake? I don't think so. You don't strike me as the circean contortionist type.
Plus, in all of my lifespan, there's only one gaming-related medium I witnessed a soul quoting Maister's Executioner blues. Thus, how not to fool yourself endorsing one with such a taste in les belles-lettres?
|
|