Random 2

HAPPY HALLOWEEN x.com/stone_toss/status/1851987492582441220

I identify as your tard wrangler

(Looks at market.) Uhh,

Disclaimer:
NoisyVelvet is not a registered investment, legal or tax advisor or a broker/dealer. Discretion and personal research is advised when making important financial decisions. The officers at NoisyVelvet, Inc. do not assume responsibility for any successes or downturns in areas of the market that affect you personally. Actions upon any speculatory advice that you wish to rely upon should be viewed as a risk and respected as such. Have a good day.

Not all Hollywood celebrities have permanently left Xitter. But where did you hear that Blusky has that big of a CP problem as of now? Just wondering.

So how is it not a giant worthless echo chamber like reddit?

Free speech is not a one way road, shit collectivist. Oh, and why were you so silent about the abuse of mod power by twitter mods under Jack "asshole hypocrite liar" Dorsey? Reminder that Dan Schneider is a pedo and so is Tom Hanks, James Gunn, and maybe also Spielberg as well.

It feels so lonely to read these kinds of conversations. Both sides are completely inept. To hear you guys speak with any conviction about whether there is or is not any amount of child pornography on either platform says one of two things about you.

1. You searched for and evaluated child porn on both platforms and made a comparison about whether they do or don't have a concerning amount of child porn accessible on their platform.

2. You heard some dumbass say something without doing any follow through to check the facts and without being asked, you're parroting it here.

The most charitable opinion for me to have is that you're a gullible idiot who entrusts authority to the truth on people who are talking completely out of their ass. It's very easy to just make up shit that people won't challenge you on because there's a risk of ending up on a watchlist if you take the time to look it up. I don't know what the fuck you guy's see on the internet because everyone builds their own unique algorithmic content stream through the social media channels they use. It's depressing to know we somehow share a common interest in Doom while your search histories are probably way fucken different than mine.

If you're seeing child pornography peppered into your feed, first of all this would really only happen if you're following adjacent topics to begin with. Presumably, you're either a pedophile yourself who enjoys content in the ballpark of child porn, or you're larping as some kind of a vigilante cop who complains about it but doesn't actually do anything.

See, if you actually give a shit about how easy it is to access child porn on either platform, you would quietly report it to the platform's moderation team so they can remove it, and there would be no use talking about it. Both platforms have moderation staff and they will act accordingly.

Those that play pretend renegade cop slash superhero dad about catching pedophiles, first, there's communities for that. Go join them and talk about it there. I don't want to see people acting like they're heroes for children on the Doom forum. I've seen the way you talk to people who could be easily mistaken for children. We know who you are. Second, catching and apprehending pedophiles is mostly the same kind of thankless and mostly invisible social justice work akin to protecting marginalized and disadvantaged groups. It's not a political preference and the divide makes no sense. I don't know why neocons keep pretending like they and leftists are not on the same page about this, and why neocons act like any stranger's kids deserve their unconditional protection but less fortunate adults deserve nothing. Third, I know from firsthand experience being an administrator of this forum, that the people that purport to be the strongest about "protecting children" are the laziest about reporting content on this very forum, challenge even the slightest enforcement of policy, and can reasonably and contextually be presumed to not have children of their own. When you do have a child, the only children you really need to protect are your own. You protect them by ensuring they have a safe and secure relationship with you so they can talk to you transparently about situations that are scary or confusing to them without feeling ignored or misunderstood. You can teach them bodily autonomy, which is strengthened by allowing them to refuse things that make them uncomfortable without a fear of consequences or overreaction. You can teach them about the existence of predators and kidnappers. You can teach them that it's not safe or normal for an adult to seek a romantic relationship with them or to touch them in any way they don't feel comfortable with. They should be learning this from their parents, and these tools should not be deferred to a different adult. Yes, including you. Children are not too stupid to understand this, but they're not going to understand or feel safe watching their dad put another human being through a fucking woodchipper.

I don't know a whole lot about Jack Dorsey other than that what he said in that one interview he had on Joe Rogan, so I'm not saying this as an "I'm on his side" but rather to say that the reasoning he used for his moderating policies is sound and I agree with that.

Essentially, what I got out of it is that the content you see on a platform is comprised of what its users add to it. When it does not appeal to your preferences, this is not a problem of the platform itself. The platform is not leftist or conservative. You follow the accounts of the people you like, block the ones you don't, and your experience will reflect the actions you took to facilitate what you want to be seeing.

The most commonly confused argument I see about the biases in social media discourse is that when someone uses the platform says "I believe in racial justice" and they get a reply that says "who cares what you think because you're a pedophile," the person replying usually get's penalized, which erroneously adds weight to the argument that the platform favors leftist voices. When you pick someone who speaks about leftist ideals to call them a pedophile, you're not refuting a political stance. You're just harrassing them. When you're on a platform that benefits from as many people using it as possible, there's an expectation that you can use the platform without being abused by the other people that partake in it. That's a standard right of the platform, and there should be moderators that enforce that.

So going over how clearly dumb people are to be speaking with any conviction about a platform harboring pedophiles or doing enough to curb pedophilia, just fucking report it or call the appropriate authorities. The conversation is pathetic trash-reality-tv style voyeurism larping as advocacy for human rights and justice when it can be easily solved with mutual participation in ending it. There's actions you can take to fight the problem and arguing on a Doom forum about it is not even close to the right ones.

There is inclusion of pedophiles in factions of the Doom community that needs to be routed out.

Exhibits A, B (multiple posts), and C.

Aside from CardboardMarty's (now unlisted) video that blew things wide open in the first place.


Awareness needs to be raised that over 320,000 children were trafficked under the outgoing regime. A lucrative government contract was even issued to traffic many of them for labor. CPS has been a trafficking empire for decades. Senators were murdered to keep that covered, aside from all the children later disposed of.

As long as known famous blatant pedophiles walk free, mohels suck infant blood, and dumb normies are totally oblivious about the overall plague of crimes against humanity, awareness needs to be raised.

We need more woodchippers!