Aziz Ansari falsely accused in #metoo movement

So basically he made a sexual advance (god forbid) on a girl that went back to his apartment after a party and then respected her wishes when she declined and got her an uber? Shouldn't they be targeting the guys who don't back off? Because there's more than enough of those guys in Hollywood.

Feminism is Cancer.

Who'd want to bang that goofball? No wonder she bailed.

Hollywood has a REAL problem with elites getting away with indecently exposing themselves to other men, women and children... groping them, threatening to use violence, blackmail or influence (within the industry) to force them to comply with their sexual demands, actual rape, setting up "interviews" that end up with the interviewee getting cornered... all cases that have something in common, and that is malice and ill intent is involved.

Adding some guy who probably had a poor game or failed to read her vibes or pick up on body language (or gave off goofball vibes because he got rejected) just looks like a selfish ideological move (on feminism's part) to advance the definition of sexual harassment. When you're drunk sometimes you get over confident and don't pick things on things like body language and don't actually know if you're going to get lucky until you pull a move. Guys can make misjudgments, too.. especially when alcohol is involved.. when I once got rejected by a dream girl I really really liked.. I tried to take it in stride but eventually became an awkward weirdo and everything from my posture to my body language shut down and while I tried my best to remain polite I definitely gave off weird vibes and had everyone asking me to relax. Oftentimes it's these low energy vibes that repulse women the most. Given that it was only later she doubled down it might be this?

Either way, speculation aside, why does the article go on to mention he gave her the wrong wine anyway? He clearly took "no" for an answer, there was always an easy way for her to walk out of the "situation" and call an Uber so obviously there was no coercion, feminists always say that you have to communicate you want sex.. so how does he deserve a spot even in a Buzzfeed or Teen Vogue rantpiece... let alone a movement dedicated to exposing the sinister shit I mentioned in my first paragraph. Where is the malice? Where's the coercion? I love reading juicy details about karma catching up to an out of touch elite psychopath.. where can I find them? I don't even see any existing feminist talking point that he's in violation of.