|
Post by deathevokation on Nov 29, 2017 14:33:18 GMT -5
Fucking hell, Jim Sterling's as cringey and arrogant as he is gross... if this world had any justice in it, these people probably wouldn't be alive. It seems so contradictory that someone behaves like a complete moron when they're supposed to report on gaming and are supposed to empathize that there are games made to cater every type of niche and that developers often do things to set themselves aside from other games so that they aren't in direct competition with them (and don't risk the "x is a poor man's version of y" label), I mean hell... this applies not to just games.. and even then, since when were games supposed to be so inclusive? How fucking entitled do you have to be that you can't just accept that maybe you just might not be the target market!?
|
|
|
Post by Olroda on Dec 10, 2017 16:21:33 GMT -5
It's the future now. Never before in the history of mankind has it been this easy to get your voice heard. Unfortunately, those that have little of value to say often shout the loudest.
Also, weren't (game) journalists always shit?
|
|
dn
Body Count: 02
the motherfucking darknation
Posts: 1,762
|
Post by dn on Dec 17, 2017 9:32:05 GMT -5
Actually, there were some pretty fearless game journalists out there when the medium was young. Stuart Campbell could always be relied upon when it came to sheer brutality. I seem to remember Total magazine not giving any shits whatsoever for the feelings of their publishers either. I'm honestly not sure when the rot started in; I guess it happened when print began to die and the writers began to prostitute themselves for ad-space. Too many paper magazines led to a massive cull and the survivors formed a natural monopoly on game news. Added to the games companies themselves forming syndicates / amalgamating and you have the same recipe for corruption and incompetence that dominates the rest of the entertainment industry.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2017 5:31:40 GMT -5
I still crack up at the really, really bad Cuphead gameplay that looked like the dude was drunk as hell, and the dude was crying like "I wrote books on gaming dammit I have credentials!" The only thing I could possibly think was "welp I'm glad I never bought one of your books". The incompetence is staggering, but I really don't care about "gaming news" and prefer to just see raw gameplay footage of something I'm interested in, so it results in some fucking quality lulz. It doesn't excuse the bullshit, but still
|
|
|
Post by deathevokation on Apr 2, 2018 4:14:27 GMT -5
Just let this sink in: Imagine if you will.. being angry that a generic shooter has a silent redneck protagonist that defends Americans from a murderous cult instead of finally being able to role play your perverse degenerate psychopathic fantasy of killing Christians (but it's ok because if you had it your way; you'd justify it by forcing the team to make an opening cutscene depicting your favorite straw man that "everyone I hate is a racist" so you can hold a flower in your left hand while shooting them with your right hand because you now have higher moral ground, everyone that disagrees with your sense of moral superiority is also a racist cuz they're defending the racist characters and not because your narrative is creepy at all, obviously).. this is the deep Rick n Morty level social commentary we need in games.. a game where you can kill the people that you spend every day on Twitter fighting with or writing articles about. Personally, my view on games is that they're art.. and as such, there's critiquing art and ruthlessly ripping it apart.. then there's relying on moral outrage culture to forcefully impose your ideology on someone's hard work.. using guilt, "activism" and shaming tactics which is selfish as hell and is censorious. In a healthy society you should allow people to express their art on their own terms, even if commentary is shoehorned into it by them... if I find said commentary stupid like I did with the latest Mass Effect; I can just play something else that's worth my time (my steam library has probably 3000+ hours worth of a backlog of games anyway haha).. at most I'll poke fun at something if it's especially cringey or get annoyed if it's a call for violence towards an existing person.. but trying to lobby for a cultural shift in other people's work to fit your principles is selfish as hell. Other than that I only get annoyed when a dev does this to a beloved franchise that they played no hand in helping it achieve cult status in the first place; like Beamdog's passive aggressive edits to Baldur's Gate which messes with the lore in a way that could inhibit future sequels. ;P The thing that annoys me are the talking points these people make when a game or movie actually does have social commentary shoehorned into it by pretending the people complaining are "delusional!" or they'll say "but games always had politics in them, it's impossible for them not to!"... but when a game legitimately has no politics you get this garbage:
|
|
Justince
Doomer
Professional Face-Puncher
Posts: 495
|
Post by Justince on Apr 2, 2018 11:05:39 GMT -5
The review from Polygon was equally inane. Like i'm going to believe they wanted the game to be MORE political. They would have immediately shot it down through some stupid SJW lens or another extreme viewpoint. As it stands it's not 'political enough'. Note how incredibly heavy-handed and forced the story was in New Colossus, also to the point of absurdity, where BJ's dad is depicted and SO RACSISTSTS he's practically eating the faces of black people for breakfast. Whatever. Polygon is a fucking shitshow.
|
|
40oz
diRTbAg
Posts: 6,105
|
Post by 40oz on Apr 2, 2018 11:20:39 GMT -5
"Farcry 5 is apolitical to the point of absurdity"
I don't know anything about Farcry so that headline makes no sense to me whatsoever.
Is Farcry at some sort of politcal statement deficit and so they are accountable to make a stand on some issue in the form of releasing a game, and by releasing a game with no political stance they are being aggressively neutral?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2018 11:31:54 GMT -5
When they first showed the trailer for Far Cry 5, everyone thought it will be about killing crazy, religious, KKK-like white nationalist and the right was pissed at it. Now when the game actually came out it turned out that it has no politically motivated elements and it's just rednecks vs other rednecks. The roles have turned - now the left is pissed and the right pretends they never gave a shit and start praising the game.
It doesn't really matter because the game itself is a boring piece of dogshit, like every other game by Ubisoft.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2018 22:36:02 GMT -5
The best Far Cry game was the first one. It was a somewhat novel idea at the time, and fairly well executed in my opinion. You were placed in a lush large-scale jungle environment with plenty of potential cover, but were outmanned and outgunned by the enemy, so you had to rely on stealth and cunning rather than Doom-style brute force tactics to complete objectives. The twist revealed in the middle of the game was that the island you were on was being used to create genetically modified super-soldiers, which became your primary opposition in the second half of the game. There was no pussy shit like regenerating health or a perpetual moron compass guiding you safely to your next objective, you had to figure things out and learn to fucking play the game well to win. Pretty cool game. It all went downhill from there in my opinion.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 24, 2018 16:19:46 GMT -5
I don't think I ever finished FC 1. I blame that more on the overpowered mutant monsters than the 12 frames a second I played the game at when I did.
|
|