Donald Trump on Joe Rogan lol what

OMG! It's Donald-fucking-Trump!

Watch the video and find out.

It's gonna be a long 4 years for you guys, 40. lol

Just out of curiosity, when he wins and the Democrats refuse to certify it like they're planning, will you be speaking out against refusing to peacefully transfer power?

I know you didn't! I'm just saying that's what's going to happen, they're already talking about refusing to certify it. But I think Trump not appearing on podcasts and stuff like that before was probably because people were afraid of being blacklisted or physically attacked for "platforming" him. Now that people are less afraid of supporting him, more people will openly do it.

I promise I wasn't trying to argue with you, just pointing out that the dems are about to do exactly what they've been accused him of doing.

Meanwhile, over at the Authentic Self party...

Mountain Dew and game streams on Twitch! Right gamer bros?!?

Sorry I misread the double negative in your earlier post. I thought you were asking if I was going to refuse to accept donald trump as president when/if he wins.

Hillary said it was rigged when Donald won, Donald said it was rigged when Biden won, etc. etc. It just sounds like sore losers whining to me. Nothing ever comes of it. I don't really have an opinion about it one way or another. It's just talk.

My anecdote is I don't really know many people who think highly of Kamala Harris. She's already been Vice President for the last four years and none of the problems people had with Trump ('s policies, not his decorum as a person with a leadership position) has really improved in any way. Harris speaks pretty much entirely in platitudes. With that in mind, I don't think people are as threatened by Donald Trump becoming president as they were the first time considering he has already been president previously. Yeah the pandemic sucked, the riots sucked, the capitol hill thing sucked, and all the shootings sucked but I seriously don't think anyone truly believes Biden or Harris would have handled it a better way.

Donald Trump goes into a little more detail about the news' depiction of polls in the interview above, and I think he's correct. The news strongly favors democrats and democrats have huge budgets for their campaign, which I think serves as an illusion that they are successful.

It's actually favorable for both candidates to get as many people to vote as possible, so the polls will misrepresent numbers to make the election feel like it is very close every election just so people will go out and vote. If the news indicates either side is winning by any sizeable margin, people won't vote. They either already know their candidate is winning or they think their vote is too insignificant to pull their candidate over the finish line. At one point in the interview (I don't remember the timestamp, sorry) Donald said the news was saying that Hillary already had Wisconsin, but when the results came out, he won in Wisconsin by a landslide.

Joe Rogan adds (which is one thing I agree with Joe on) is that Joe Rogan has never been surveyed to answer who he's voting for. I've never been surveyed to ask who I'm voting for either. So where are these numbers coming from? For four years I worked professionally in programming digital surveys, and in my experience there I learned that it's pretty much impossible to collect survey responses for free. Nobody wants to answer and submit questions to a database unless you pay them. So whatever this data is, if it's even real data at all, must be skewed in some way because of a financial incentive to collect it.

I have my own problems with Donald Trump. I can't make sense out of why he thinks immigrants are so dangerous/expensive and tighter borders are safer for everyone. I can't figure out the logic behind it. I'm in a long distance relationship, so stricter borders actually affects my life in a direct way. My partner is indigenous central american and we go out to get ice cream together, old white women give her a snide glare like she doesn't belong here. I live in a racially mixed area with a lot of hispanic people. They've built a lot of businesses in my otherwise decaying neighborhood and the old white republicans with Trump signs on their lawns are mostly retired shut-ins who are bitter about taxes, inflation, and pronouns. They feel empowered by Donald's fiery and cynical speeches.

In debates, Donald Trump is always saying the cities are cesspools, the immigrants are coming in droves to traffic our women and children and burn our neighborhoods down with guns and drugs and crime, then abuse our government programs. There's no way this is true. There's hardly any beneficial government programs most people are entitled to anyway.

It was cool to see in this interview that he can just be a normal person and has some ideas to do some cool things. But in his pursuit, his public persona is dividing my local community, (and my internet communities) into hating people that don't deserve it, and no amount of calmly talking to them changes their minds.

Possibly also on the very fact that the race according to most pollsters is tight. Most polls historically had huge bias towards Dems, so if it looks tight, and if they hadn't adjusted the biases, it probably means that the Reps are quite a bit ahead. This is, of course, just an assumption. We cannot know (and even the pollsters themselves won't know until after the fact) whether they are more accurate now than they've historically been. So I prefer to be cautious in my prediction as well.

The thinking behind this is that if you allow for uncontrolled immigration of whoever wants to come in with no or minimal screening - you will, in general, not get an influx of good law-abiding citizens willing to work and fit in, but mostly misfits that are looking for quick and easy ways for themselves, and this typically does not spell anything good for the people already there. That's just a claim. Whether you find it convincing or not is another story.

I don't understand your response at all. I would like the question asked in a very human way. He's honest about most things but the lack of transparency about this is really jarring.

What did the Central and South americans actually do to Trump? What is the origin story for this? Consider the amount of money we put into police spending and military weapons with almost nothing into social programs and infrastructure within our borders. There's no way that any of the people causing problems locally for US citizens can be neatly categorized into one specific race of people. It's completely full of shit and concerned (scared) white people in my local communities buy it unquestionably.

I get the general belief. But the fact remains that democrat party presidents such as Barack Obama and Bill Clinton have been very tough on borders as well. Maybe even more so than Trump.

I don't understand what service it is doing for the country to deflect the source of the issues towards other people when it's not accurate. Our overflowing prison population is almost entirely naturally born US Citizens. My nearest city has tons of US citizens selling drugs as a sidehustle.

The United States has pretty much given up entirely on helping it's own people and has deferred everything to private businesses who only have profit incentives that drive their actions. Historically, past presidents such as FDR would enact social programs like The New Deal which opened social security, food and welfare programs, and built road infrastructure, and resisted unfair labor practices. Theodore Roosevelt was instrumental for national public parks. These president's programs have carried a pretty long legacy which allowed our major roadways and national parks to come to fruition, but nothing like that has ever happened again in over 60 years. Nowadays the simplest suggestions create so much manufactured conflicting points that nothing ever gets done, and when unresolved issues exacerbate, Donald Trump points loudly and publicly at immigrants every time and idiots shout "hell yeah"