You banned in doomworld?

tbh, i always thought that various minorities want to fight against segregation, not for making it stronger and deeper. but various "activists" doing everything possible to segretate even further, and to play the victim card on any occasion.

i never asked people about their orientation, we just don't have any reason to talk about it. why the fuck should i care? or why the fuck should they care about mine? there is nothing to be ashamed of, it simply doesn't matter.

this is Doom, not some fuckin' eroge! Doomguy is not fucking monsters (if you're not playing HDoom, of course), and he has NO personal story in the game. also, it is very easy to play as Doomglo, even in vanilla. i believe that this solves any personal kink requirement possible.

i don't have anything against "LGBT(insert-your-preferred-letters-and-signs-here) mapping project", i simply think that it is stupid. "straight mapping project" would be equally stupid. as if somebody's orientation (or color) has something to do with the ability to draw linedefs.

I've talked to 40 enough that I don't think he actually cares what they think. Certainly won't lump him in with those asshats at least. Even if I think some of what he says sounds like post modernist gobbledygook at times.

There is no norm 40oz, Doom wads don't have a gender or sexual orientation, and that's the end of it. By suggesting "straight" is the norm, you sound like an insane person. Also, bringing things like CP guidelines and map quality is quite desperate and has nothing to do with the problem here. Of course community projects have requirements and rules, and maps can be denied based on it, who is arguing about that? If you're not able to abide by the rules of a project, your map might get rejected, big deal, it's your own fault. These things have nothing to do with sexuality, gender and race. You, too, will never going to accept some newbie, who can barely draw a room into the Doomer Boards Projects... would that make you homophobic or racist? No, because Doom mapping has nothing to with these things and it should remain this way. Creating projects centered around sexuality, race, politics is the opposite of that and may lead to a very bad trend.
Honestly, the more i read your stuff, the more i'm convinced you're just a bad troll, because some of the things you post are beyond nonsensical, very hard for me to believe that a grown person can operate and think this way. So i'm not going to bother anymore, you're not worth the trouble, and i have no desire to argue with trolls or delusional people with their heads up their asses.
I was hoping you at least have the balls to actually do something about the state of this forum, but i was too naive. Surprise, surprise, after you started your little "forum revolution" thread and a bunch of people told you the truth of how useless of an admin you are, you now pretend that thread never happened, and you're back at ignoring every problem that you should be solving.

Let me elaborate on the DW thing, because you lack the ability to understand basic logic. The reason i'm calling you DW puppy, is not because i thought DW mods are part of the gay project. I called you DW puppy because you often defend DW bullshit when someone here has criticism of how things are being handled there. The existence of this project is once again a proof of bad moderation, and here you are defending it once again.

I've seen this everywhere online too. God complexes, in other words they want a rule that everything they are as a person is the strongest and non-criticizable thing, but then when someone who is inevitably different comes along, they will, dare I say it, "watch their career with great interest", and intentions can go awry at a moment's notice if someone spots even ONE thing wrong. Being an absolute control freak is the issue, and the normies in the minority group who normally side with them may just realize that being way too radical is actually hurting who they could be. I never want to be part of something self-destructive.

Tangra Yes it is the norm. If you're straight, do any of these experiences line up with your own?

1. Spending over a decade of your childhood being confused or ashamed of yourself for being attracted to the opposite gender because adults think having the vocabulary to identify what straight even means is too mature of a topic for you. Meanwhile they spend most of those years babysitting you with lesbian disney princess movies and have no capacity to understand why that is confusing.

2. Having a childhood friend of the opposite sex that is too insecure about their own sexuality to continue being platonic friends with you after they find out you're straight.

3. Having to decide with any new friend you make whether it's best to shoe them away by being annoying and announcing you're straight too early, or developing a bond with them first and then wasting all of that time and affection when you tell them later that you're straight and they can't handle it.

4. Having to constantly make concessions to watch a movie in a theater with your friends by always settling on one that has a protagonist with a love interest you can't identify with because almost every movie protagonist ever is attracted to the same sex. Not withstanding movies that are actually good, reviewed well by peers, or worth watching.

5. Being worried that if you tell your parents you're attracted to the opposite sex they might be frightened, alarmed, disappointed or might even punish or abandon you for making them or others aware of it.

6. Growing up with an awareness that no romantic relationship you'll ever experience will allow you to biologically procreate (easily) and without costly, invasive, and potentially dangerous medical intervention.

7. Having to answer questions at work or at a dinner party about what attracts you to the opposite sex to people who either cannot grasp it or are morally opposed to accepting it as a reality -- having repeated conversations with different people who are always in the same level of awareness, and being always positioned into disproving that gay is the only thing in existence.

8. Going to a social event where same sex people hit on you, and then having to break their heart, sometimes multiple times in a day, when you tell them you're not attracted to them and then having to answer questions from drunk emotional sad-sacks like "Aren't there bars for straight people to go to instead?"

9. Sharing a neighborhood with people who openly attend churches that fund straight conversion camps; camps that enroll children in programs to manipulate straight kids into being gay out of a fear of god. Said churches have been successful since before you were born at achieving funding, influencing people to register, and convincing the government they shouldn't need to pay taxes while they do it.

10. Knowing that your political leaders today attend and donate to these churches despite, you, and others, advocating against an intertwining of church and state for hundreds of years.

Do you need more examples of how our society is already centered around being straight? Gay people have to deal with this shit all the time. Just let them have a fucking doom project, fuck.

He lost the plot entirely (he's good at that), it's like we're speaking different languages.

Establishment clause "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."

We're already far beyond that. For example, holy matrimony is a religious sacrament.



Tangra said moments ago that the mental faculties of these mappers must be compromised to have an idea for a project in which straight people aren't entitled to intervene and because of that, it shouldn't exist (less maps/mappers for Doom).

I said its valid for gay mappers to make maps for Doom with other gay mappers (more maps/mappers for Doom)

Can you just use ChatGPT to summarize it or something? You're making no effort to help me understand what needs explaining.

An elected official attending and donating to the church of their choice is not establishing a national or state religion, nor making a law concerning such.

Defining and legislating marriage, "holy matrimony" if you will, is relegated to the states per the Tenth Amendment, so Congress has no purview there. Or shouldn't, at least.

Tangra said the project shouldn't exist, which is a valid opinion. This is different than actively trying to shut the project down and not letting them "have" it.

"Spending the time wasted on circular online arguments making a map for this month's DBP instead" challenge (impossible)

Look, i asked you already. I'm acting in good faith here. Ive now edited out the words "and the literal words of the written U.S. constitution"

from:



to:



Have we gotten any closer to understanding what this has to do with Doom or not?

I'm willing to fill you in where you need assistance, but please take the time to think about what you dont understand before you follow up.

I need assistance figuring out why you're trying to turn the tables in such a weird fashion, but here is the best play-by-play I can give you:

1. I pointed out that the behavior you are attributing to straight people ("I think this is a vastly different dynamic than the default straights thinking they have a right to everyone else's communities and to be unchallenged in any way.") is being demonstrated by the organizers of this project in the form of a giant PSA in their post clearly stating that they must be unchallenged in any way.

2. You explained the context of what you meant, which I understood and to a certain degree agreed with.

3. You dropped the Top 10 Struggles of the Gay Person in America in response to Tangra's opining about how integrating sexuality, race, politics and other issues are always going to be divisive and are generally a bad idea for Doom community projects.

4. I asked you how any of that was relevant to Doom or the conversation.

5. After a brief disagreement about the Constitution, you asked me how any of this was relevant to Doom or the conversation.

These community projects naturally came into existence because they are made by doomers from other countries which have their own communities and forums, you'd have to be able to speak their language to join them and I'm sure as shit they wouldn't exclude you for simply not being russian or japanese (hence why Memfis participated in that french community project). Also bold of you as a straight guy talking on behalf of homosexuals and how they feel. Pretending any sane person would think 'UGHHHH, wish there was a mapping project for gay black people only, this new speedmapping CP probably consists mostly of white guys goddammit' is peak retardation even by leftist standards.