Gokuma
You're trying to say you like DOS better than me, right?
R.I.P. Aaron Bushnell and over 34,000 genocided Gazans.
Posts: 1,018
|
Post by Gokuma on Nov 15, 2023 16:31:54 GMT -5
|
|
dn
Body Count: 02
the motherfucking darknation
Posts: 1,728
|
Post by dn on Nov 16, 2023 1:03:00 GMT -5
nah it's always looked like that.
|
|
BIG DICK NIGGA
this post is a lie about my bodily proportions
Major Arlene obsessed, 100% verified freakazoid. AKA bzzrak
Posts: 2,296
|
Post by BIG DICK NIGGA on Nov 16, 2023 2:38:27 GMT -5
I am willing to adopt any number of young attractive female Lebanese refugees in case those Jews try anything!
|
|
|
Post by wernergoldberg on Nov 16, 2023 2:47:15 GMT -5
please only follow proper race mixing criteria (wakanda forever chuds x natasha)
|
|
|
Post by deathevokation on Nov 16, 2023 14:01:03 GMT -5
If all Hamas militants decided to do the unimaginable, and come out on the first day of the war (after the initial massacre), unarmed, waving white flags, and announce their surrender - not a single one of them would have been killed. But they can't even help themselves to not execute civilians lmao.. vxtwitter.com/iranistani/status/1724488849835909261 (NSFW btw)
|
|
shibainumaster
Doomer
Kombucha Mushroom person (sits around all day)
Posts: 420
|
Post by shibainumaster on Dec 3, 2023 7:23:39 GMT -5
Lol the glowies are working overtime in this thread. The situation didn't start out of nowhere on the 7th of October, it is a result of 75 years of systematic Israeli ethnic cleansing of the native Arabs, all supported by western imperialism. In fact the existence of Israel itself is only thanks to Western imperialism. Israel exists only "by force", and as long as it exists there can't be peace. Sad but true, like it or not! Truthful bit of history. But I think what adds to the issue is that the people in that region can't decide who's land is that in general, and who inhabited it originally. The ethnocgraphic term "Palestenian" was made up only when the land we call "Israel" was being settled in (To quote kosherpedia: During the Mandatory Palestine period, the term "Palestinian" was used to refer to all people residing there, regardless of religion or ethnicity, and those granted citizenship by the British Mandatory authorities were granted "Palestinian citizenship".). There are the Philistines, but they are only loosely connected to the modern "Palestenians"; Most of that land was parts of the surrounding countries (i.e Some of it was part of Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, etc.). And they still can't decided who the fuck owns West bank (Both happy merchants and the gracious martyrs of Allah have influence there), so make of that what you will.
|
|
|
Post by dr_st on Dec 3, 2023 9:13:41 GMT -5
There are the Philistines, but they are only loosely connected to the modern "Palestenians" If by 'loosely' you mean 'not at all', then - yes. The two are connected as much as any person who is currently living somewhere is connected to any other person who ever lived there. I think what adds to the issue is that the people in that region can't decide who's land is that in general, and who inhabited it originally. It is all very simple if one understands that POV of Islam. From a Muslim zealot POV - if any piece of land was at any one point controlled by Islam (and controlled can be defined as loosely as 'one Muslim rode his donkey and the donkey pissed in that spot') - then that is Muslim land forever more, and if it is ever lost, it must (and shall) be reconquered. So in that sense - it does not matter who lived there first, and when, and why were they displaced and by whom. Since it is provable fact that the entire land known as Israel/Palestine was at certain periods in history under Islamic domain - the Muslim Arabs under no circumstances can or will give up their claim to it. That is the one and only meaning of "from the river to the sea".
|
|
shibainumaster
Doomer
Kombucha Mushroom person (sits around all day)
Posts: 420
|
Post by shibainumaster on Dec 3, 2023 10:43:41 GMT -5
It is all very simple if one understands that POV of Islam. From a Muslim zealot POV - if any piece of land was at any one point controlled by Islam (and controlled can be defined as loosely as 'one Muslim rode his donkey and the donkey pissed in that spot') - then that is Muslim land forever more, and if it is ever lost, it must (and shall) be reconquered. So in that sense - it does not matter who lived there first, and when, and why were they displaced and by whom. Since it is provable fact that the entire land known as Israel/Palestine was at certain periods in history under Islamic domain - the Muslim Arabs under no circumstances can or will give up their claim to it. That is the one and only meaning of "from the river to the sea". That actually explains a lot. I've seen this approach concerning Islamic rule in other territories before.
|
|