Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 13:36:12 GMT -5
Well, it's not a murder case involving a civilian. It's the most powerful country in the world stating it will destroy a hostile rouge state. The world is in a state of anarchy, and believe it or not, but international law does not apply to the US. so the UN can go take a shit standing up. No it does not, but if the UN or the world sanctions you? Then what? And yeah it is a murder case, you are wanting to wipe out a rouge state with a dipshit leader, killing innocent people in the process...How can you be okay with that? Easy, the U.S. stops funding the UN, which it pays for the lion's share of. lol Perhaps even re-purpose the UN building in NYC into a missile silo.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 13:39:10 GMT -5
Without the US, the world economy would tank, and the global infrastructure would implode. The world sanctioning the US is far more destructive, than us nuking Iran. The world trades in U.S. dollars lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 13:42:57 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 14:49:02 GMT -5
Are you trying to convince us or yourself? Also the UN has always been a toothless, dickless organization with or without the US. They couldn’t really stop Georgão or Georginho bombing the shit out if Iraq now could they? If the Americans want to keep throwing away good money after bad on this antiquated scheme instead of looking out for their own downtrodden good luck to them! Like Kontra for example, can’t more funding be made available for the mentally retarded such as he?
|
|
Justince
Doomer
Professional Face-Puncher
Posts: 492
|
Post by Justince on Aug 1, 2018 15:06:14 GMT -5
If the Americans want to keep throwing away good money after bad on this antiquated scheme instead of looking out for their own downtrodden good luck to them! Trump campaigned on American interests first and a withdrawal of troops and forces from 'ungrateful' countries. Maybe he and Putin decided our involvement with Iraq was a good media distraction and good for Russian interests. Might as well go for it before his dirty dealings catch up with him. So now that action is applauded. His base is consistently lined up waiting for the next fresh log of shit to ooze from his asshole they don't even know what they want anymore expect that next heaping load. Eat well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 15:19:37 GMT -5
This withdrawal of forces from ungrateful countries is a great way for America to save face other than the reality of "we can't afford this shit anymore, time to cut back on our world domination plan." I'm starting to think the powers that be installed Trump as President to do all of the necessary unpopular stuff that America needs to do and have him take the flak for it as he is already an unpopular guy. Then the next President that they want that will restore pride and face has a clean slate to work with.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 15:38:58 GMT -5
The world trades in U.S. dollars lol I don't know why, there are much more valuable currencies out there... :/ Still waiting for you to give me an instance when liberals supported unbeneficial war...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 16:12:33 GMT -5
Aren't you nervous about Kontra's WMDs Violet? Such as his patented dreaded triple post? Or a yo mama?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 17:42:20 GMT -5
No he just made another wide claim about liberals and I'm waiting for him to show me instances of which the things he proclaims happened
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 18:15:59 GMT -5
Come on son of cunt, you know Kontra doesn’t deal in facts. That’s hardly fair to him now, is it? Didn’t I raise you to not make fun of the patriotically retarded?
|
|
40oz
diRTbAg
Posts: 5,534
|
Post by 40oz on Aug 2, 2018 18:46:22 GMT -5
Thread unlocked.
In this thread, talk about the legitimacy of Trump wanting to bomb Iran. If you have something else you want to talk about, make a different thread.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2018 19:52:19 GMT -5
No he just made another wide claim about liberals and I'm waiting for him to show me instances of which the things he proclaims happened Here's an example, the War in Libya that toppled Gaddafi. I don't see how we could have benefited from it. It opened the door to a massive migrant crisis that the world is still dealing with. I think Obama didn't do a good job at managing the war in Iraq either. Because he decided to not increase the amount of troops there. Thus, ISIS was able to grow in the place of Al-Qaeda as a major threat in the region. I think he decided against it, because he vowed to end the war in Iraq during his campaign. So increasing troops would run counter to his campaign promise. Now that doesn't mean I think the war in Iraq was a good idea to begin with. I didn't like, and I still don't like George W. Bush. Nevertheless, the situation at the time needed to be handled properly. Then there's the fiasco of Afghan troops of raping young boys. The Obama administration had known it was happening, but had looked away. Maybe they didn't want to make waves, since they were troops the US was training to stabilize the country. However, I think it is completely inexcusable. Stuff like this makes me feel like there's a double standard in press coverage. Not many people even know about this incident. But if it were to happen under the Trump administration, there would be an uproar. For example, when Trump merely called MS-13 animals, he was hurranged by the media for weeks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2018 20:13:36 GMT -5
If those innocent people are reduced to a pile of smoldering radioactive flesh, you can thank the leaders of Iran for it. No, WMDs should always be the last resort not the opening act.If you're spending so much on military and are proud of your force's superiority then why don't you start a ground war, not an apocalypse. Let me be clear, with joking and hyperbole aside. I don't think Trump is actually going to use nuclear weapons to assault Iran. Trump does not have it in him to commit mass genocide. He has not advocated for it. Nor is it justifiable. He's not a Hitler, like the media portrays him to be. I believe this is tough talk, and there is a better way to achieve conflict resolution. If there were military actions against the country, it would be targeted at the Iranian military, and not the civilian population.
|
|