Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2018 23:08:52 GMT -5
I haven't watched the news lately, but I just saw Trump and Putin meet. I'm watching Tucker Carlson right now, and hearing about it.
Tucker made a good point about the hypocrisy of the media making a big deal out of this. He said if people are so against Russia, due to moral reasons, why aren't they equally as outraged by our relationship with Saudi Arabia and China. Both are extremely oppressive regimes as well, and commit human rights violations.
He also said that the real outrage is coming from Neoconservatives, that believe this is counter to their idea of realpolitik.
|
|
Justince
Doomer
Professional Face-Puncher
Posts: 492 
|
Post by Justince on Jul 17, 2018 11:15:02 GMT -5
I haven't watched the news lately, but I just saw Trump and Putin meet. I'm watching Tucker Carlson right now, and hearing about it. Tucker made a good point about the hypocrisy of the media making a big deal out of this. He said if people are so against Russia, due to moral reasons, why aren't they equally as outraged by our relationship with Saudi Arabia and China. Both are extremely oppressive regimes as well, and commit human rights violations. He also said that the real outrage is coming from Neoconservatives, that believe this is counter to their idea of realpolitik. Oh is that why people are against Russia? Or is it because there is undeniable, unequivocal proof that they have interfered with our election system and the core sovereignty of our nation? It's not just some annoying guy in the corner of the tin-foil hat meeting shouting about rigged elections, it's the entire US intelligence community, they're all on board and it's a fact. Trump smiles in front of all of us, pats his friend Putin on the back, "Well he says he didn't do it, and that 's good enough for me. Witch-hunt. Fake news." Of course it is Trump. What kind of man would have the stones to admit the very real likelihood his Presidency is a sham influence by an outside, hostile government. What kind of man discredits the work of hundreds of men and women in this own countries highest offices of law enforcement uncovering how deep this gross, blatant attack by a foreign body goes. If anything I think the media are downplaying this. They keep dancing around a very simple, straightforward word: Treason. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2018 15:35:05 GMT -5
I haven't watched the news lately, but I just saw Trump and Putin meet. I'm watching Tucker Carlson right now, and hearing about it. Tucker made a good point about the hypocrisy of the media making a big deal out of this. He said if people are so against Russia, due to moral reasons, why aren't they equally as outraged by our relationship with Saudi Arabia and China. Both are extremely oppressive regimes as well, and commit human rights violations. He also said that the real outrage is coming from Neoconservatives, that believe this is counter to their idea of realpolitik. Oh is that why people are against Russia? Or is it because there is undeniable, unequivocal proof that they have interfered with our election system and the core sovereignty of our nation? It's not just some annoying guy in the corner of the tin-foil hat meeting shouting about rigged elections, it's the entire US intelligence community, they're all on board and it's a fact. Trump smiles in front of all of us, pats his friend Putin on the back, "Well he says he didn't do it, and that 's good enough for me. Witch-hunt. Fake news." Of course it is Trump. What kind of man would have the stones to admit the very real likelihood his Presidency is a sham influence by an outside, hostile government. What kind of man discredits the work of hundreds of men and women in this own countries highest offices of law enforcement uncovering how deep this gross, blatant attack by a foreign body goes. If anything I think the media are downplaying this. They keep dancing around a very simple, straightforward word: Treason.
1. Central Intelligence Agency
2. Office of the Director of National Intelligence
3. F.B.I.
4. National Security Agency
5. Justice Department
6. House Intelligence Committee
7. Senate Intelligence Committee
www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/07/16/us/elections/russian-interference-statements-comments.html
Here's the U.S. Intelligence Community. I'm skeptical of their assessments, given the fact that they've always been anti-Trump. I'm agnostic on this issue. Even if they did try to influence the election. I voted for Trump on my own volition. There's nothing to suggest the alleged interference had any significant impact. But if someone could show me if it did, I would be willing to accept the evidence. They say a lot of dead people voted for democrats. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2018 14:17:17 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2018 0:40:40 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2018 16:20:05 GMT -5
Obama's hot mic slip when speaking to Russian President Medevev
Raw footage:
|
|
TOS
You're trying to say you like DOS better than me, right?
Glenzinho's Chicabro
Posts: 1,045
|
Post by TOS on Jul 26, 2018 2:59:16 GMT -5
To the best of my recollection, their "interference" was moreso just trying to sway peoples' opinions and votes.
Isnt that what we all do in comment sections?
|
|
